Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Bone Volumetric Density, Microarchitecture, and Estimated Bone Strength in Tumor-Induced Rickets/Osteomalacia <i>Versus</i> X-linked Hypophosphatemia in Chinese Adolescents.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) · 2022 · PMC9234144 · PMID 35769089

3
hedged sentences
0.0750
closest p · 1.5× alpha
0.0760
boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significancep = 0.075so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
At the distal tibia, although the total bone area was similar (22.2%, p = 0.195) and the difference of the trabecular bone area only reached marginal significance (36.6%, p = 0.075) between the TIR/O patients and the healthy controls, the TIR/O patients still had 40.5% significantly smaller cortical bone area than the healthy controls ( p = 0.002).

also in 5,069 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.076so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Comparing the TIR/O Group to the XLH Group At the distal radius, compared with the XLH group, the TIR/O group showed significant or marginally significant differences only in a few trabecular parameters ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1A ), such as lower trabecular number (-28.6%, p = 0.076), greater trabecular inhomogeneity (79.0%, p = 0.049), and larger trabecular separation (51.2%, p = 0.074).

also in 26,082 other papers

Unlike vBMDs, differences of aBMDs between groups did not reach statistical significance, which might be caused by the huge variations within groups, further indicating that aBMD is not an ideal parameter to evaluate osteomalacia.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.