Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy.

Adv Urol · 2022 · PMC9239822 · PMID 35774194

1
hedged sentence
0.2200
closest p · 4.4× alpha
0.2200
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP =0.22not close (p > 0.1)
Similarly, our meta-analysis shows a higher ER of continence recovery after fixed (0.63 (95% CI 0.55–0.71)) and adjustable slings (0.65 (95% CI 0.58–0.72)), intermediate after artificial sphincter (0.50 (95% CI 0.34–0.66)) and ProACT (0.53 (95% CI 0.36–0.70)), and considerably lower after bulking agents (0.33 (95% CI −0.12–0.78)), although differences did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.22) ( Table 4 ). 5.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.