A neural signature of exposure to masked faces after 18 months of COVID-19.

Neuropsychologia · 2022 · PMC9283123 · PMID 35850282

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0610

boldest claim

The sentences

almost significantp = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

3.2.1 N170 amplitude and latency In the ANOVA carried out on N170 amplitude, the main effect of Face was almost significant ( F (1, 18) = 4.32, MSE = 3.19, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.19), with larger amplitude for Masked (−4.14 ± 0.81 μV) than for Unmasked (−3.61 ± 0.79 μV) faces.

also in 1,858 other papers

verged on significancep = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Exposure verged on significance ( F (1, 18) = 4.05, MSE = 0.17, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.06), suggesting that participants with Low exposure (0.95 ± 0.01 prop) were more accurate in emotion categorization with respect to participants with High exposure (0.91 ± 0.02 prop).

also in 15 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

3.2.3 P2 amplitude and latency In the ANOVA carried out on P2 amplitude, a smaller amplitude emerged for Masked (6.66 ± 1.26 μV) than for Unmasked (7.19 ± 1.23 μV) faces, even if the main effect of Face did not reach statistical significance ( F (1, 18) = 3.98, MSE = 3.621, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.18).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.