Strategies for repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation: A multicentre comparison of nonpulmonary vein versus pulmonary vein target ablation.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol · 2022 · PMC9315029 · PMID 35257441

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0730

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = .051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Patients undergoing non‐PV target ablation showed a trend for higher AT recurrence risk than patients with PV target ablation (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.00–5.80; p = .051) after adjustment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the use of contact force‐sensing catheters.

also in 53,322 other papers

a nonsignificant trendp = .073so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

We found that, after adjustment for covariates, LA size, use of contact force‐sensing catheters, and posterior wall isolation, patients with isolated PVs who underwent non‐PV target ablation had a nonsignificant trend toward higher risks for any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 0.95–4.16; p = .073) (Figure 2A ).

also in 5,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.