approached significancep = 0.051
When analysed separately for each memory load, ST and DT recall significantly differed for load 5 [ t (1,29) = 2.39, p = 0.02, η 2 = 0.16], load 6 [ t (1,29) = 2.77, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.21], and approached significance for load 7 [ t (1,29) = 2.03, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.12] (Table 1 , Fig. 4 ), and supports our hypothesis that PRP dual-tasks demand EF of WM.