a statistical trendp=0.070
Therefore CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of patients with PeAF is slightly higher than that of patients with PAF with a statistical trend (0.89±1.06 vs. 1.27±1.25, p=0.070).
Therefore CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of patients with PeAF is slightly higher than that of patients with PAF with a statistical trend (0.89±1.06 vs. 1.27±1.25, p=0.070).
In PAF, maximal LA volume index was closely related to the presence of SEC with marginal trend toward significance (odd ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.16; p=0.072).
However, the cerebrovascular accident was prevalent, and diabetes was frequent, an important trend in patients with PeAF ( Table 1 ).