The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence.

J Cogn · 2022 · PMC9400626 · PMID 36072093

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0610

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0890

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.061so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Serial dependence of 1-item recall The retrocued item produced a marginally significant attractive bias in the no-overlap condition ( p = 0.061, permutation test; peak-to-peak distance = 1.865°; bootstrapped 95% confidence interval = [1.114°,4.855°], Figure 2A ), and a significant attractive bias in the overlap condition ( p = 0.019, permutation test; peak-to-peak distance = 2.463°; bootstrapped 95% confidence interval = [1.580°, 3.892°], Figure 2B ).

also in 26,082 other papers

approached significancep = 0.081so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In the overlap condition, the attractive bias approached significance ( p = 0.081, permutation test; peak-to-peak distance = 1.032°; bootstrapped 95% confidence interval = [0.311°, 2.335°], Figure 5B ).

also in 8,237 other papers

approached significantp = 0.089so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The difference of peak-to-peak distances between the no-overlap condition and the overlap condition was 0.889°, which was approached significant difference from 0 (p = 0.089, permutation test).

also in 127 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.