nearly significantp = 0.056
Using this approach, we observed a nearly significant group difference following training for the CPT task ( F (1,46 = 3.85, p = 0.056), a significant group effect for mft power ( F (1,44 = 4.35, p = 0.043) and a sigshynificant group effect for diastolic blood pressure ( F (1,42 = 6.93, p = 0.012), supporting the assertion that the reported ANOVA effects were not driven by trending baseline differences between groups. For post-hoc analysis of the within-group changes, we performed two-tailed, paired-sample t -tests on each group separately to test for significant differences between each testing session.