Competition among public good providers for donor rewards.

Exp Econ · 2022 · PMC9458484 · PMID 36101877

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.1100

closest p · 2.2× alpha

0.1100

boldest claim

The sentences

weakly significantp -value = 0.11not close (p > 0.1)

Considering net transfers, the two treatments that allow for exclusion do not generate significantly different net transfers as compared to Prop for period 6 (effect size for WA vs Prop is − 6.8%, p -value = 0.27 and effect size for LN vs Prop is, 5.9%, p -value = 0.41), and the comparison between net transfers for WA and LN is weakly significant ( p -value = 0.11).

also in 1,387 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported

Also as shown in Table 3 , we find a weaker link between changes in transfers when contributions exceed expectations, marginally significant in Prop and WA and insignificant in LN .

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.