Trial arm differences in child language Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, analysis of the ELM total score in the BABBLE subsample showed similar trial arm differences to those found in the full-sample [ 25 ], adjusted difference in means (adjusted by minimisation variables and by site, linear regression) = 4.01, 95% CI (− 1.57 to 9.58), p = 0.15, Cohen’s d = 0.16 ( d = 0.14 in full sample).
← all excerpts
The impact of a specialist home-visiting intervention on the language outcomes of young mothers and their children: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
1
—
—