There was a notable difference favoring the RMVS group in regards to rates of CVAs, however, this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.38–1.01; P=0.06, I 2 =0%) ( Figure 3B ).
← all excerpts
Robotic versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
1
0.0600
0.0600