Although the rf-PDT group nominally showed relatively better BCVA improvement ( Fig 4 B) and the IPTW regression analysis showed the same trend of relatively better BCVA improvement in the rf-PDT group, it did not reach statistical significance (12-month BCVA change, −0.06 ± 0.02 vs. −0.008 ± 0.02, P = 0.07; 24-month BCVA change, −0.06 ± 0.03 vs. −0.03 ± 0.03, P = 0.32, respectively).
← all excerpts
Effectiveness of Reduced-fluence Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Propensity Score Analysis.
1
0.0700
0.0700