Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.

Mem Cognit · 2023 · PMC9569014 · PMID 36239898

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0710

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0710

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = .071so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In addition, the task × state interaction did not reach statistical significance, F (1,71) = 3.35; p = .071; η 2 G = 0.002; BF Incl = 0.502, and there was also no task × deviant interaction, F (1,71) = 0.49; p = .487; η 2 G < 0.001; BF Incl = 0.076, and no interaction between state of sound and deviant , F (1,71) = 0.41; p = .524; BF Incl = 0.037.

also in 111,027 other papers

a small trendno p-value reported

Interestingly, Experiment 1 did not reveal a deviation effect in either task (though there is a small trend for a deviation effect with changing-state sequences on serial recall).

also in 722 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.