For HPA, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between injury models; however, surprisingly, HPA peaked unexpectedly at week two, and showed a trend, but nonsignificant interaction, between injury type and time, F (6, 60) = 2.093; p = 0.067; N = 6 per group (stretch-crush at week two compared to week four and five).
← all excerpts
Functional Gait Assessment Using Manual, Semi-Automated and Deep Learning Approaches Following Standardized Models of Peripheral Nerve Injury in Mice.
1
—
—