highly significantp < 0.001
Our most striking result was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001–0.05) in peak approaching YAV between the subjects with aUVL and healthy controls (HCs) across circumvention protocols (see Figures 3 – 5 ).
Our most striking result was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001–0.05) in peak approaching YAV between the subjects with aUVL and healthy controls (HCs) across circumvention protocols (see Figures 3 – 5 ).
Figure 7 shows that the departing YAVs of HCs are significantly greater than approaching YAVs ( p ≤ 0.0006) for both the straight and veering tasks with ratios of departing/approaching YAV amplitudes equal to 49.5% and 87%, respectively, whereas the ratios of the UVLs are not significantly greater for the straight trajectories (11.8%) and of borderline significance ( p = 0.05) for the veered trajectories (39.4%).
With these criteria, we obtained clearly significant differences with respect to HCs, as illustrated in Figures 5 – 8 .