nominally significantp < 0.05
Summary effects and heterogeneity between studies Of the 855 meta-analytic comparisons, 592 (69.2%) were nominally significant ( p < 0.05), with only 7.7% of strong meta-analytical evidence ( n = 66), while 18.4% ( n = 157) and 6.4% ( n = 55) were of highly suggestive and suggestive evidence, respectively (Table 1 ).