At subgroup analysis, these dedicated devices showed a trend towards an even more profound reduced risk of RAO compared to the use of nondedicated devices to achieve hemostasis compressing both ulnar and radial artery simultaneously, although differences between subgroups were not significant ( Figure S13 ).
← all excerpts
Simultaneous Radial and Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression versus Isolated Radial Artery Compression after Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
1
—
—