The role of meat appetite in willfully disregarding factory farming as a pandemic catalyst risk.

As expected, in the first analysis, those higher in meat commitment (+1SD) considered preventive solutions markedly less useful in the factory farm than wild animal market condition, b = 0.53, SE = 0.10, t (190) = 5.14, p < .001, [0.327; 0.732], whereas the effect of Source of Diseases was weaker for those lower in meat commitment (-1SD), b = 0.25, SE = 0.10, t (190) = 2.48, p = .013, [0.053; 0.457]; the interaction term only approached significance, b = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t (190) = 1.88, p = .061, [-0.004; 0.167], meaning that the slopes did not differ significantly (see Fig. 3 for estimated means).

also in 8,237 other papers