Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol · 2022 · PMC9789297 · PMID 35984541

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0530

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.1720

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

An unpaired t -test showed the difference to be marginally significant [ t (42) = 1.993, p = 0.053], but the associated Bayes factor analysis (see “ Statistics ”) suggested no evidence against the null hypothesis (of zero age difference; BF 10 = 1.1).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significancep = 0.095so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Whilst their variation across frequencies was statistically weak, reaching only marginal significance (sex-by-frequency interaction: χ 2 (5) = 9.38, p = 0.095, BF 01 > 150), its shape was consistent across waves (three-way interaction between sex, frequency and waves: χ 2 (10) = 11.5, p = 0.323, BF 01 > 150).

also in 5,069 other papers

failed to reach statistical significancep = 0.172not close (p > 0.1)

However, whilst this difference was consistent between waves I and V (compare top and bottom panels), it failed to reach statistical significance ( χ 2 (5) = 7.73, p = 0.172; BF 01 > 150).

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.