marginally significantp = 0.06
There was a marginally significant interaction, F(1, 183) = 3.52, p = 0.06, d = 0.28.
There was a marginally significant interaction, F(1, 183) = 3.52, p = 0.06, d = 0.28.
For the “no” correct trials, none of the main effects approached significance, all Fs < 2.4, all p > 0.12, all d < 0.21, for either accuracy or reaction time.
While there was a numerical trend for faster RTs with the front warning label, the main effect of label type did not reach significance, F(1, 192.17) = 1.54, p = 0.22, d = 0.18.