a trend towards significanceP = 0.054
This showed that there was a trend towards significance when comparing ET vs. non-ET [f(1,20) = 4.19; P = 0.054], but no significance when comparing ChAT vs.
This showed that there was a trend towards significance when comparing ET vs. non-ET [f(1,20) = 4.19; P = 0.054], but no significance when comparing ChAT vs.
There was also a trend to smaller CSA for ChAT-IR nerves at ET sites, though this did not reach statistical significance (μm 2 : 1355 ± 2127 vs. 3827 ± 10 156 ; P = 0.06).