Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Computational insights into human perceptual expertise for familiar and unfamiliar face recognition.

Cognition · 2021 · PMC9944378 · PMID 32586632

2
hedged sentences
0.0100
closest p · 0.2× alpha
0.0824
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .01actually significant
Finally, in addition to demonstrating that unfamiliar face identity processing was less robust than that of familiarized faces, Megreya and Burton (2006) demonstrated that upright unfamiliar and familiar face matching accuracy correlated only weakly and non-significantly ( r = .277, p > .05), whereas the correlation between performance on upright unfamiliar face matching and inverted familiar face matching was strong and highly significant ( r = .673, p < .01), leading the authors to title their article Unfamiliar faces are not faces .

also in 132,142 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.0824so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In the first session, humans showed a trend toward better performance than the DCNN ( t = 1.82, p = 0.0824) at this unfamiliar verification task.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.