Evaluation of the second stage of reconstruction showed a trend towards a higher rating of the overall appearance compared to the first stage of reconstruction for both devices, but this was not found to be significant ( p > 0.9999 in Mentor CPX ® 4 breasts and p = 0.7813 in SmoothSilk ® breasts).
← all excerpts
Is It All about Surface Topography? An Intra-Individual Clinical Outcome Analysis of Two Different Implant Surfaces in Breast Reconstruction.
2
—
—
The sentences
Ultrasound evaluation revealed significantly reduced capsules around SmoothSilk ® expanders and a highly significant occurrence of seroma formation in the upper pole of the CPX ® expander.