Similarly, for error rates a highly significant main effect of trial type has been revealed across the total sample (F (3,72) = 36.126, η 2 = .60, p<.001) and extreme groups (F (3,42) = 52.424, η 2 = .79, p<.001) indicating that detection of the task-relevant luminance change was highly impaired on perceptual conflict (LOB) trials.
Excerpts
Goodness of fit of the data were very good and all the structural coefficients were highly significant ( P <0.001).
Results were considered significant if p<0.05, very significant if p<0.01 and extremely significant if p<0.001.
Correlation of all three histological grades with the Glucksberg stage of intestinal GvHD was highly significant in terms of the maximum, median, mean, and even minimum of all three grading system scores (each p ≤ 0.001) ( S1 – S3 Figs).
Results Evolutionary allometry The multivariate regression of Procrustes coordinates (PRC) on centroid size (CS) is highly significant ( F 1, 42 = 32.18; P <0.001), accounting for 12.93% of total shape variation ( Fig. 2 ).
Warming by 4°C resulted in a highly significant reduction in CI from 4.1±0.19 to 2.9±0.17 in mussels held at ambient pH (p<0.001).
A permutation test showed that the differences in the metabolic profiles between high and low VO 2max -subjects were highly significant (p<0.001).
Moreover, there was an increasing trend in the total number of keratoplasties performed (P < 0.001 using MARS).
The mean TMT showed a highly significant correlation with CSA in both groups (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.733; p<0.001), as well as in the melanoma subgroup (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.692; p<0.001) and lung cancer subgroup (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.767; p<0.001) separately.
However, the analysis of indirect effect, through the confidence in helping the family, is highly significant (b = -1.77; z = -3.33; p < .001).
This decrease in HbA1c level was highly significant (p <0.001).
Results Combined analyses for traits recorded under stressful and non-stressful conditions Highly significant (p < 0.001) differences were detected among environments, hybrids, and parental lines for grain yield (GY), days to anthesis (DA), days to silking (DS), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH) across Striga-infested ( Table 1 ), Striga non-infested ( Table 2 ), and combined drought and heat stress (DHS) ( Table 3 ) conditions.
Cells pre-treated with morin showed a highly significant (P<0.001) decline in the ROS generation by 2.33 fold in comparison to glucose stressed cells, whereas, 1.75 fold (P<0.001) and 1.6 fold (P<0.01) decrease in ROS generation was observed in co- treated and post- treated hepatocytes ( Fig. 1c ).
All eggs exhibited a change in odour composition between day 1 and day 8 (fertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.79, P < 0.001; infertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.85, P < 0.001); however, while there was no significant difference in volatile composition between fertile and infertile eggs on day 1 (δ 1 2 = 0.15, P = 0.738), by day 8 the difference was highly significant (δ 1 2 = 0.86, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1 ).
This difference in LTI was confirmed in the ANCOVA, where a highly significant group effect (F 2,29 = 10.3, p<0.001) was detected; this factor alone accounting for >40% of the total variance.
By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.
Timepoint, location, and the timepoint x location interaction were highly significant in accounting for differences in gene co-occurrence patterns (PERMANOVA, P<0.001 for all), although timepoint explained the most variation (timepoint R2 = 0.40, location R2 = 0.07, timepoint x location R2 = 0.04).
As expected, FVB/N KLF2−/− and Tie2-cre KLF2−/− showed highly significant (p<0.001) decreases in the number of mesenchymal cells in the endocardial cushion tissue associated with the AV canal, compared to controls.
Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).
In Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, the difference in means turns out to be highly significant (z = 45.558, p<0.001), showing the overweight vignette to be rated consistently more negatively.
The first two axes were highly significant, RDA1 (F 1 15 = 364.026, P≤0.001) capturing 89.3% of outcomes variance, and RDA2 (F 1 15 = 25.828, P = ≤0.001), an additional 6.34%, totaling 95.6%.
Interaction analyses In the logistic regression modelling, we found highly significant ( p <0.001) additive gene effects for the LOC387715 and CFH loci, both having approximately the same effect size ( Table 3 ).
The increased occurrence of positive p21 expression in the hypoxic group was highly significant (p<0.001).
In both depots the presence of rhythm was highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).
All these differences were highly significant (p < 0.001).