Excerpts

The analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) among genotypic variance and genotype × environment interaction variance.

In all regions, there were highly significant differences between the actual and expected stand age distributions (average ages of dominant trees with no fire exclusion) ( P <0.001, Fig. 2A–F ), indicating that fire was the predominant disturbance prior to effective fire exclusion.

When both individualistic and communal phrases are included in a regression equation predicting year, only individualistic phrases are significant, though communal phrases showed a marginal trend (Beta = .71, p <.001; for communal phrases, Beta = .23, p = .06).

According to ROC-analysis, ASP after 12 months showed a highly significant AUC of 0.94 (p <0.001) to differentiate between the two response groups.

The intercept, representing the baseline use of novel forms for the reference category ‘Greece’, was estimated at -4.774 with a highly significant p-value (p <.001).

The strength of inter- and intralimb coordination estimated with the length of vector r was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all groups and attained values of 0.95–0.98 in intact rats, while saline and Riluzole treated rats showed ranges of 0.84–0.98 and 0.79–0.97, respectively.

Critically, the cross-over interaction between the Target Type and the Prime Type was highly significant, F 1 (2, 30) = 14.17, MS e = 44.37, p <.001; F 2 (2, 56) = 12.97, MS e = 63.49, p <.001.

Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that models discriminated well and log-rank test were all highly significant (all p<0.001), except upper urinary tract model (p = 0.366).

Statistical analyses were done using one way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in R program (alpha value 0.05) with P value <0.001 considered as highly significant. ‘***’ denotes P<0.001.

After adjustment for age and sex, highly significant results remained ( P <0.001) (data not shown).

The interaction between Pre and Fre was highly significant (est. = 0.005, p < 0.001).

The resulting quadratic function (y = .091x 2 –1.491x + 9.980) was highly significant, explaining 74.06% of the variance ( r = .86; F (2, 1118) = 1596.3, p < .001) (see Fig 2 ).

However, the analysis of indirect effect, through the confidence in helping the family, is highly significant (b = -1.77; z = -3.33; p < .001).

We found that the full-null model comparison was highly significant (GLMM; χ 2 3 = 16.23, p = 0.001, N = 672).

Results WFT feeding preferences (choice) and effects of leaf orientation On normally-oriented cotyledons (abaxial side-down), an aversion to adaxial-feeding by Western Flower Thrips (WFT) was highly significant on both genotypes based on Monte Carlo simulations ( P <0.001; Figure 1 ), whereas the preference for feeding on the abaxial and edge varied depending on the plant genotype (Atlas: P <0.001, V07: P =0.138; Atlas: P =0.196, V07: P <0.001, respectively).

To compare between all conditions we performed a Friedman’s ANOVA test, which was highly significant ( F r (5) = 46.21, p <0.001), indicating that our image treatments were influencing perception of scale.

When p RBCs were the target cells, there was a highly significant positive correlation between anti-Neu5Gc IgG and anti-nonGal IgG (P<0.001) ( Fig 5C ).

The ILD test revealed highly significant (P<0.001) incongruence in phylogenetic structure between the largely nuclear ISSR data and the plastid sequence data.

There was a highly significant difference in overall resource fish biomass between MPAs and open areas (χ2 1, 384 = 19.4, p < 0.001), but no significant difference in non-resource fish biomass (χ2 1, 384 = 0.20, p = 0.67).

A clear trend observed in wealth index, women from richest wealth group revealed more than thirteen-times higher AOR of 13.451 (5.231 to 34.589 at 95% CI, p < 0.001) for institutional deliveries compared to poorest wealth group, which was statistically significant.

The association between the presence of intestinal parasites and children on solid food diet (exclusively or had combined feeding) was highly significant (χ2 = 23,226, P ≤0.001).

Specifically, the relationships between the two smallest size classes (50–75 μm and 75–100 μm) of zooplankton and the larval fish density were highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.001; Fig 3A and 3B , S3 Table ).

The sub-group analysis excluding subjects who experienced only an AT/AFL recurrence demonstrated the association between non-paroxysmal AF and non-PV mediated AF remained highly significant (OR 6.15 [2.24 to 16.85], P<0.001).

For all of the laboratory-raised birds a DFA based on morphological variables was highly significant (Wilk's λ = 0.12, P<0.001) and correctly identified 100% of the individuals in a post-hoc classification based on a prior expectation of 50% correct classification by chance alone.

The DFA was highly significant (Wilks’ lambda <0.001; Chi-square 65 = 392.0; P <0.001).