Traits such as branch number, boll number, and seed yield per plant demonstrated highly significant responses ( p < 0.01) to all three factors, genotype, planting date, and their interaction, suggesting that these traits are highly responsive to both genotype and planting date.
Excerpts
The correlations between these elements were highly significant with p < 0.01.
In the analysis of the GSE135917 dataset, eight highly significant HMRDEGs exhibited a statistical significance level of p < 0.01 when comparing the OSA samples to the Control samples, namely: ANXA5 , CLU , DSP , DUSP1 , GRN , MAP1LC3B , PLOD2 , SLC2A3 ; Fourteen HMRDEGs were highly statistically significant ( p < 0.001) in OSA samples and Control samples in dataset GSE135917 , namely: RBBP4 , UCHL1 , MAPK9 , CLINT1 , GABARAP , CAV1 , SQSTM1 , FLT3 , NLRP3 , USP33 , ATP6V1A , CDKN2A , NR4A1 , PPARGC1A .
Results Variation in fresh tuber yield per plant The analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) among the genotypes, year and genotype by year interaction effect for tuber yield per plant (Table 1 ).
The addition of 10−6 M IAA, GA3, and ZT significantly increased cell density compared to the HAN group ( p ≤ 0.05), with the differences becoming highly significant after 4 days ( p ≤ 0.01).
In the original spectrum, the spectral reflectance at 400–605 nm and 847–2400 nm had a highly significant relationship with free iron content ( P < 0.01), and at 400–685 nm and 797–2400 nm was significant relationship ( P < 0.05) with soil free iron content.
Differences between AKI and controls were statistically highly significant for both GLCM indicators (p < 0.01).
The effects of available K on tree volume were highly significant ( P < 0.01), and the clay content had significant effects on tree volume ( P < 0.05).
Results Physiological traits Photosynthetic rate According to the combined ANOVA (Table 2 ), the effects of location, fertilizer, and spraying were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01).
However, at 60 m, the correlations became markedly stronger, with features such as B-DIS (r = -0.81), B-ENT (r = -0.81), R-MEA (r = -0.82), and R-ENT (r = -0.82) showing highly significant negative correlations (p < 0.01, |r|> 0.80).
In addition, the interaction between phosphorus and potassium showed a highly significant effect at the 1% probability level ( P ≤ 0.01) (Table 2 ).
The differences in biochemical characteristics of Sanguisorba minor genotypes were found to be highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01).
Similarly, it is highly significant (p < 0.01) when the result is compared for the 90 min and 10 min segment.
Despite food restriction, there was a clear trend of increase in FAA, PPA, and NA over time (day 1 compared to day 10, U test, p < 0.01 for all parameters), in alignment with previous findings.
This difference was most predominant, and highly significant, in the NaF-EDTA-citrate test group ( p < 0.01).
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\upsigma }_{{\max}}$$\end{document} and S ANOVA results are shown in Tables 7 and 8 , where P -value is the probability, and the significance of the model and factors can be judged by the P -value, the model is extremely significant when P < 0.0001, highly significant when P < 0.01, significant when P ≤ 0.05, and non-significant when P > 0.05.
An extremely significant difference was inferred when P < 0.01.
Blood analysis Complete blood analysis report indicated that the effect of PDT by TP (TP-0.4) was highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) on the total lymphocytes count and white blood cells when the results were compared with the control group (TP-0) and other treatment group (T-0.4 for TiO 2 only and P-0.4 for TSPP only).
Therefore, the large percentage (80%) of air pollutants among the chemicals interacting with specific lung cancer genes is highly significant (p < 0.01, Fisher test).
The influence of pH on the algal Chl a and MDA were extremely significant ( P < 0.01).
Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05 and highly significant if p < 0.01.
In contrast, the mutation frequencies of two types of mutation (G = >T, C = >A) manifested a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.01 ), accompanied by an unapparent change of three types of mutation (A = >C, C = >T, G = >A) (p > 0.05) in the REV1 knocked down cells.
himalaica genome (ω > 1); of these genes, 598 showed significant evidence of positive selection (P-value < 0.05), and 487 were undergo extremely significant positive selection (P-value < 0.01) ( Supplementary Table S3 ).
A highly significant effect of treatments on CCD1 was observed, with data analysis revealing a substantial interaction effect ( P > 0.01) between genotype and different growth stages (S1 and S2).
NMC-1 genome (ω > 1); of these genes, 70 showed highly significant evidence of positive selection (P < 0.01) ( Supplementary Table S5 ).