At the maturity stage, except for the grain DM content, the difference between the ecotypes was highly significant (p < 0.001) for all the bromatological parameters analyzed for the three parts of the plants (grains, leaves, and stems) (Table 4 , Supplementary Tables 4 , 5 and 6 ).
Excerpts
The correlation between aggression and courtship over the two salinity levels was highly significant (r Pearson = 0.58, df = 43, p < 0.001; Fig. 4 ).
The treatment effect of CsA-CE drop was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all groups (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ).
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( X 2 ≥ 575.55, p < .001 each), indicating that correlations between items were sufficiently large for conducting principal component analysis.
Of the 7 biomarkers, only pTau217 had a highly significant negative effect on MoCA ( P < 0.001).
Further, DMI showed a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) with ADG (r = 0.65), initial BW (r = 0.68), final BW (r = 0.82) and MBW (r = 0.77), and moderate correlation ( P < 0.001) with FCR (r = 0.54).
These values are highly significant ( P < 0.001) when compared to the percentage of cells attached to tubules during the first time-lapse of the video (2 hours).
This frequency dependent effect on response amplitude was highly significant for all four types of eye movement responses (P < 0.001).
1 c) were significantly higher in the PFLA group than in the CTRL group, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
Future anxiety increased as people’s physical and mental stress deteriorated at an extraordinarily significant level, from sometimes (odds ratio = 6.819, p < 0.001) to often (odds ratio = 11.744, p < 0.001) compared to no.
2 B various treatments applied in this research work had highly significant impact ( p < 0.001) on root length.
Additionally, after removing the seasonality component, the Mann-Kendall test showed that there was a significant trend ( P < .001); therefore, we also included the trend effect in the BSTS model.
*** indicates a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.001.
When comparing local and regional recurrence by site, there was a highly significant difference in tumor recurrence (Log rank test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively).
A highly significant difference was observed between the RM and control groups in the combined datasets ( p < 0.001).
The overall changes in dentin thickness were less in the RM group (0.27 ± 0.24) than in the WG group (0.78 ± 48), with a highly significant statistical difference between both groups ( P < 0.001).
A paired-samples t-test revealed a highly significant difference (n = 8, t (7) = 20.3, p < 0.001) between the two treatments.
In general, all categorical factors (land use, clay mineralogy and climatic factors) presented highly significant effects for the whole model ( p < 0.001).
We also assessed whether the prevalence of subclasses was the same or different across genders and found that overall difference in the prevalence was highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).
Results Behavioral data One-way ANOVAs revealed a highly significant (p < 0.001) effect of load (low, medium, high) on reaction time (RT; F (2, 90) = 44.7) and accuracy ( d’ ; F (2, 90) = 70.5).
The overall genetic differentiation among populations was low but highly significant (G st = 0.026; P < 0.001).
The 100 μmol/L apigenin treatment led to a substantial and highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in sperm membrane integrity compared to control, improving from 40% integrity in control to 68% integrity with 100 μmol/L apigenin (Fig. 3 a).
There was also an extremely significant difference (p ≤ 0.001) between Hg. janthinomys and Ae. albopictus (p < 0.0001).
4 , with increasing concentrations of HQ, the CLU protein concentration exhibited a decreasing trend, with statistically significant differences ( F = 34.093, p < 0.001).
Highly significant community level differences were observed between Fraction (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001), Collection (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) and feed (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) based on the Bray–Curtis distances while less significant changes were contributed by breed (PERMANOVA p-value = 0.037) (Table 1 ).