Correlation analysis of perception-related constructs and other variables Kendall’s correlations were highly significant between constructs C1 and C2, C1 and C3, C2 and C3, C3 and C5, and C4 and C5, with a p value < 0.001 in each case, whereas there was no significant correlation of qualification with experience (p value 0.681), site of work (p value 0.386) and working hours per week (p value 0.153).
Excerpts
In the monetary domain, the correlation between risk and ambiguity attitudes remained highly significant but slightly decreased in both phases (Phase 1: r = − 0.445, p < 0.001; Phase 2: r = − 0.394, p < 0.001).
These effects are usually highly significant (P < 0.001, see Figs 4 , 6 , 7 ).
*** indicates a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.001.
Moreover, participants with asthma demonstrated a higher prevalence of COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis (COPD, Emphysema, ChB) (31.1%) than their counterparts without asthma (6.8%), with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).
However, the difference in benthic community composition between habitats was highly significant (R = 0.8, p = 0.001).
A decreasing trend of the pN 0 disease proportion was observed with both increasing histological grade and decreased differentiation ( P < 0.001).
The regression is highly significant and positive (slope = 0.300, R 2 = 0.844, p < 0.001, fig.
The relationship between DBD and CCA was highly significant (AOR = 3.46; 95% CI 2.74–4.36) followed by LM (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.81–2.86) P value < 0.001.
Since there was a highly significant difference in prevalence of D. repens between sled dogs (four-fold higher) and other dogs (mainly pets; dog status × D. repens infection: χ 2 1 = 23.0, P < 0.001; Table 1 ), this also contributed to the lower overall prevalence in 2019.
This random subset was sufficient to establish the highly significant differences in GC content and contig size ( p < 0.001; Table 5 ); analyzing all 219 plasmid contigs would not have altered the conclusions and was therefore unnecessary.
In contrast, Fridays, Tuesdays, Saturdays, Sundays, and Mondays were significantly different from each other and decreased in the above order as indicated by a highly significant ANOVA (F(6, 8275) = 1002, p < 0.001) using Tukey’s HSD (p < 0.001) on heteroskedastic and normal distributed residuals.
Algal amendment (Amend) had a highly significant impact onplant growth ( P < 0.001).
Differences were considered not significant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01 and extremely significant (***) when p < 0.001. or (****) when p < 0.0001.
The statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant association ( p = 0.001) between the type of stimulation and responses to the “other changes” category in the questionnaire.
An increasing trend was observed in the mean levels of serum ALT and GGT across the SUA quartile groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively).
Furthermore, location and genotype had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on the CNP and DM of roots and leaves.
In our analysis, the OR for the heaviest drinkers (Q5) was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.11–0.52, P < 0.001), with a significant trend test ( P = 0.001).
Using phylogenetic ridge regression of S 1 against time, we observed a highly significant decreasing trend in S 1 for K = 1 (Fig. 2 a, slope = −149.18, p < 0.001, Table 1 ) and, to a lesser extent, for K = 3 (not shown).
Meanwhile, one-way ANOSIM also revealed a highly significant effect of sampling site (Global test R = 0.448, P = 0.001) based on fish abundance data.
The difference remained highly significant after multiple logistic regression analysis and Bonferroni correction [ p < 0.001 OR = 38.2 95% CI (17.57–83.04)].
According to Supporting Table 2, Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests showed that while some ECG features (e.g., SD2, Mean_RR) lacked statistical significance ( p > 0.05), several EEG features (e.g., HiguchiFD_2, HiguchiFD_7) were highly significant (adjusted p < 0.001).
All the drivers were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The test results are represented in the respective plots using asterisks as follows: **** P < 0.0001—extremely significant; 0.0001 < *** P < 0.001—extremely significant; 0.001 < ** P < 0.01—very significant; 0.01 < * P < 0.05 -significant, P ≥ 0.05—not significant (ns).
A highly significant disparity was observed for plasma cell levels across groups ( p < 0.001).