C20:4 n −6 followed a decreasing trend across dietary groups with the lowest percentage in piglets fed CH with the enzymatic mixture ( p < 0 . 001).
Excerpts
Statistical analysis of mechanical properties As displayed in Table 11 , both the BaSO4 concentration and the number of fabric layers had a highly significant effect on stiffness ( p < 0.001), with a strong interaction between them ( p ≈ 7.1 × 10−8).
The percentage of appropriate prescriptions per month showed a different trend between physicians and non-physicians (Table 2 ); in particular, an increasing trend was observed in physicians (β = 0.07, SE: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.04; 0.10, p < 0.001), while a significant decrease was observed in non-physicians (β = -0.13, SE: 0.05, 95%CI: -0.23;-0.03; p = 0.013).
The relative mRNA expression levels of the Vg gene showed markedly significant differences between the treatment groups and the control groups collected on the days 9 ( F = 156.06 6; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001), 18 ( F = 131.693; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001), 26 ( F = 257.967; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001) and 32 ( F = 376.706; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001).The Vg mRNA expression levels in insects treated with 60 μg/mL Vg protein were 27-, 51-, 6-, and 2.5-fold higher than those of control groups on days 9, 18, 26, and 32, respectively.
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( X 2 ≥ 575.55, p < .001 each), indicating that correlations between items were sufficiently large for conducting principal component analysis.
ANOVA revealed that among the 36 cherry tomato genotypes, all 17 traits exhibited highly significant (P = 0.001) and significant (P = 0.01) variations indicating the presence of adequate genetic differences among them.
However, splitting the dataset into haplotypes from Botol and Cikaniki showed that Tajima’s D was not significant in Cikaniki (D = 0.001, ns) but highly significant in Botol (D = − 2.5, p = 0.001) suggesting a selective sweep.
The regression model of the training set predicting the test set was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and indicated that the selected variables explained 37% of accuracy values.
A highly significant increase in the levels of ROS ( p = 0.001) was also evident in the worker group compared to the control group.
Furthermore, Language exhibited a highly significant statistical association (χ2 (1) = 25.50, p < 0.001), with the English group demonstrating significantly lower productivity than the Chinese group (β = −1.034, SE = 0.205, p < 0.001).
Of note, differences between isolated IUGR and e-PE were highly significant at 22–25 weeks of gestation ( p < 0.001).
For average pupil diameter, the results of two-way ANOVA showed highly significant effects of the color of chairs ( F (5, 35) = 8.187, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.028), but without main effect of the form of chairs ( F (5, 35) = 0.809, p = 0.543 > 0.05, η p 2 = 0.003), or interaction between color and form ( F (5, 35) = 0.290, p = 0.998 > 0.05, η p 2 = 0.005).
Pooling data from all conditions and tasks together, the differences in latency resulted statistically highly significant between AW and the other two variables ( P < 0.001 for both comparisons) being just significant between EP and RT ( P < 0.05).
Analysis of variance revealed that temperature (A), catalyst loading (D), and the methanol-to-oil ratio (C) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas reaction time (B) showed moderate significance ( p = 0.0645).
The effect of N on yield was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), while the interaction effects of S-N and Y-S-N had remarkable effects (0.001 < p < 0.05).
Model analysis demonstrated a highly significant time effect across all models (all P < 0.001), indicating a marked increase in B-line scores over time.
Within small ruminants, a highly significant disparity was detected among Ovis aries , Capra hircus , and Capreolus capreolus (F2,176 = 38.59, p < 0.001), with Ovis aries showing the largest average centroid size (CS), followed by Capra hircus , while Capreolus capreolus consistently exhibited the smallest values.
A significant difference in the evaluation of the individual diameters could be observed in all directions with a highly significant difference in AP and CC direction (p < 0.001) and a very significant result in ML direction (p = 0.008).
A one-way ANOVA test indicated a highly significant difference between the groups (F = 22.20, p < 0.001), validating that the observed differences were not due to random variation.
A moderate, highly significant negative correlation was observed between FLAIR and FA (ρ = −0.345, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.170).
The robustness of these non-linear relationships was confirmed by likelihood ratio tests comparing two-piecewise versus standard linear models, which were highly significant across all populations (Model I: P < 0.001; Model II: P < 0.001; Model III: P = 0.002; Model IV: P = 0.043).
Variability of seed morphological and biochemical traits The variation was highly significant among accessions for all the quantitative seed morphological traits ( p < 0.001).
By comparing the network to the 1,000 randomized networks, we found that the matrices, coefficient clustering and mean shortest path for our protein network are highly significant (p < 0.001).
2b ) were highly significant overall (Pseudo-F = 14.68, p = 0.001) and also between all treatments ( Table 2 ).
When relating extraction times to particle size distribution, a highly significant positive association was found with Q 100μm (p < 0.001).