Within the erosion/abrasion groups, Welch’s ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among materials, with effect F (4, 19.24) = 929.25 ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Specifically, Gclc showed a significant difference ( p < 0.01), while the other nine FRDEGs displayed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
The F ST pairwise comparisons among all groups corroborated results of the PCoA and allowed for the detection of highly significant (P < 0.001) values of differentiations (Table 3 ).
Statistical analysis was done using unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (* p<0.05), very significant (** p<0.01) and extremely significant (***, p<0.001).
For all genes examined, induction was minimal and less significant in KO1 mice, whereas changes in KO3 and DKO mice were highly significant and of greater importance ( p ≤ 0.001).
The differences between the thrombus entities were found to be highly significant (H = 105.83; p < 0.001).
Analysis of the presence of these four patterns among the four treatment groups showed highly significant differences ( P <0.001) in three of them ( Figure 2 ).
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001) demonstrating the importance of CD8 + effector T cells in MVA-BN ® -HER2-mediated anti-tumor efficacy.
Among men, a significant trend was found, both with regard to individuals without hypothyroidism ( p < 0.001), and with hypothyroidism and levothyroxine treatment ( p = 0.021), while no such association was found among women.
Differences between groups were highly significant (χ 2 = 80.94, degrees of freedom (df) = 7, P < 0.001).
The number of microvilli per 10 μm decreased at increasing concentrations of the pesticide, when compared to controls (15.6 ± 2.408), with a highly significant difference at 1 μg/mL (6 ± 2.449; p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ). 4.
INR values in both groups revealed highly significant increases at the postoperative 1 st hour and postoperative 24 th hour compared to preoperative values ( P <0.001) [ Table 1 ].
The difference in the mean correlation is highly significant (p < 0.001, two sample t tests) for each point (all values of d ) on both curves ( Figure 2D ).
The difference was still highly significant ( P <0.001) after correction for age, calcium, hemoglobin and albumin in multivariate analysis.
Nuclear thickness at various grades of LOCS III showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference between the LOCS III grades from Grade 1 to Grade 6.9 [ Figure 2a ].
While there were no statistically relevant differences in the distribution of non-fibrotic ILD across the AAV groups, a highly significant difference in this distribution could be observed for the fibrotic ILD (p < 0.001), with the MPA group showing the highest prevalence of fibrotic ILD.
Additionally, the interaction with trial block was highly significant ( F (1,14) = 18.509, p = 0.001) due to a greater reduction in the hexagon maze than the radiolarian maze ( Fig. 4 B).
The analyses of renal function as a relevant influencing factor showed highly significant correlations between eGFR and radioactivity concentration across the entire cohort ( p < 0.001 and R 2 = 0.76); a higher eGFR correlated with lower radioactivity concentrations in the blood samples.
However, there was a positive trend between QFTGIT and TST positivity (X 2 = 96.76, P < 0.001).
In the absence of tetracycline, highly significant lethality was observed in transgenic individuals relative to wild type (χ 2 = 285, d.f. = 1, p < 0.001).
The disparity was not statistically significant in OS ( P > 0.05), while the difference was extremely significant in CSS ( P < 0.001).
Notice that the correlation between these variables is highly significant: AOA Catalan and Catalan proficiency ( r = −0.4, P < 0.001, later exposition to Catalan, decreased proficiency in Catalan) and AOA Catalan and Language use ( r = 0.53, P < 0.002, delayed onset of Catalan exposition, greater use of Spanish).
The between-group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Highly significant inverse correlations were observed between L1-4 spine BMD values and age, serum OC, ucOC, and ALP values (r=-0.425, P <0.001; r=-0.431, P <0.001; r=-0.349, P =0.001; and r=-0.393, P <0.001, respectively).
Differences between the groups were considered statistically significant when p<0.05, very significant p<0.01, and extremely significant p<0.001.