Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results of the 2 (age) × 4 (GA groups) repeated measures ANOVA performed on the results obtained in the BDI at 22 and 60 months of age indicate that there was a highly significant effect of age (intra-subjects differences) on cognitive development (F(1)= 5315.463, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.975).
A Follow-Up Study of Cognitive Development in Low Risk Preterm Children.
Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2020 · PMC7178262
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It was seen that all the morbidities were more prevalent in EG, that is, Group A and the difference of prevalence of morbidities between Group A and B was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the musculoskeletal disorders in which difference in prevalence was not statistically significant.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, however, for the Bowel and Urinary summaries, model coefficients for time and quadtime were highly significant (all p < 0.001) and pre-BL ADT patients exhibited a significantly greater decline in urinary scores per follow-up compared with those who had not received pre-BL ADT ( p < 0.0025).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, species differences in the proportion of aphids that fell from the host plant as a result of chill coma were highly significant (χ 2 2 = 20.80 p<0.001), with significantly more M. dirhodum falling from the plant as a result of chill coma, and significantly less R. padi than expected (relative proportions for M. dirhodum , R. padi and S. avenae are 0.45, 0.02 and 0.21 respectively).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant ( P <0.001) positive Pearson correlation of LVSV measurements by EV and TTE for the whole cohort (EVVTI, r = 0.934; EVMM, r = 0.896) and for subgroup analyses for OTX subgroup (EVVTI, r = 0.929; EVMM, r = 0.869), SEPSIS subgroup (EVVTI, r = 0.911; EVMM, r = 0.863) NEURO subgroup (EVVTI, r = 0.955; EVMM, r = 0.899), and PREM subgroup (EVVTI, r = 0.786; EVMM, r = 0.728).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As the correlation between pull-out force and pull-out force per area was found to be highly significant and very strong (Pearson’s correlation coefficient R = 0.970, p < 0.001), pull-out force was used as the only biomechanical parameter for the remaining animals. 2.6.