Pre-treatment differences of intelligence (MWTB) and education (education in years) affected the results of the mixed-effects models, and the inclusion of both factors as fixed factors lead to significant main and interaction effects, especially the main and interaction effects of intelligence (MWTB) were all highly significant in each model ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The δ 13 C cor values showed a decreasing trend with increasing forest cover ( P < 0.001) ( Table 2 , Fig 3a ).
The interaction between lockdown and trauma was statistically highly significant, with examinations performed on trauma patients decreasing more than the others ( p < 0.001).
The primary endpoint occurred in 6.8% of patients treated with colchicine and in 9.6% of patients treated with placebo, representing a highly significant relative reduction of 31% (hazard ratio 0.69, CI 0.57–0.83; P < 0.001).
We have found 76 genes from this 320 genes overlap to our gene signature and which was highly significant (p-value<0.001).
For mean values of different age groups Anova showed highly significant differences at P < 0.001 between at least two age groups for PSA values.
These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001), also in the case of the global score.
All eggs exhibited a change in odour composition between day 1 and day 8 (fertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.79, P < 0.001; infertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.85, P < 0.001); however, while there was no significant difference in volatile composition between fertile and infertile eggs on day 1 (δ 1 2 = 0.15, P = 0.738), by day 8 the difference was highly significant (δ 1 2 = 0.86, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1 ).
The interaction eye ∗ case was highly significant (F(1,49) = 8.6; p = 0.001), meaning that the amplitude difference between eyes open and eyes closed was greater in the CON group (cf.
These associations were highly significant (adonis2 p < 0.001, species-level microbiome, 999 perm, min. 5 animals per host group, Table S3 ).
2 , also in these experiments, the muscles from the mutants showed lower (30%) initial absolute tetanic force than those from WT mice, the difference between the two genotypes being highly significant (P < 0.001) throughout the 60-s stimulation period.
The interaction effect of X 3 *X 4 , and the quadratic effects of X3*X3, X4*X4, were found to be highly significant ( p -value < 0.001; see Figure 3 b,c), indicating that these factors interact, and any change in one would affect the other, as well as the response.
A significant trend towards increased association with gallbladder cancer was observed with potentially higher-risk FEN1-69G > A genotypes (P < 0.001, χ2 trend test) and FEN14150G > T (P < 0.001, χ2 trend test) in gallstone presence but not in gallstone absence (P = 0.81, P = 0.89, respectively).
TP values ranged between 2.27 and 5.34 and increased as the thickness reduced in all groups with highly significant correlations ( r > 0.94, R2 > 0.89, p < 0.001).
A paired two-group t test indicated that the difference is highly significant, with p < 0.001.
Specifically, all participants showed a significant trend of improvement over “time” (HG: F = 191.872, p < 0.001; Lesional MT: F = 591.088, p < 0.001; Unaffected MT: F = 268.64, p < 0.001; FMA-UE Scale: F = 326.59, p < 0.001; HAMD: F = 183.71, p < 0.001), suggesting that patients’ performance on various assessment indicators improved with the continuation of rehabilitation training.
Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.
There was a significant trend that the longer the duration of drug use, the higher the improvement rate relative to 11% with < 30 days of use ( p < 0.001).
The differences versus placebo were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both active compounds, whereas the comparison between silodosin and tamsulosin did not show a statistically significant difference.
Between some population groups and some heavy metals, the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Its amplitude is more expressed when the target was present (M = -1.72, SD = 2.01), to when it was absent (M = .28, SD = 1.77), and this impression was confirmed by the rmANOVA with a highly significant main effect of target presence (F(1, 26) = 21.90, p < .001, n p 2 = .457).
Differences between absolute moral values and nonmoral values were again highly significant across tradeoff modalities ( p < 0.001, see Table S3 ).
The level of significance denoted with double asterisks means highly significant P < .001 values. 3.
The overall effect of tetanus intensity was highly significant [ F (4,25) = 21.2; p < 0.001], and individual ANOVAs revealed significant effects of tetanus intensity at each test intensity [ F (4,25) > 9.0 in all cases; p < 0.001].
These effects are marginally significant ( P = 0.095), but the genetic effects due to differences among four QTL genotype combinations C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T are highly significant for both species ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 4a ).