Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
According to the cut-off value determined by ROC analysis for SII, median PFS was 5 months (95% CI, 2.94–7.06) in the low SII group and 4 months (95% CI, 2.79–5.21) in the high SII group, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
By 7 years of follow-up, the positive association between CCL18 and all-cause mortality in the patients as a whole ( Table 3 ) remained highly significant in the univariate analysis (p < 0.001), and the association with MI was also significant (p < 0.001), whereas the association with stroke was non-significant (p = 0.18).
highly significantP>0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Conclusion: The relation between MMP9 expression and D-score value in cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia was highly significant P>0.001Thus, incorporating both MMP9 immunoexpression and D-score value would increase the accuracy of diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and low grade endometrial adenocarcinoma.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Quality of Life, Utility Weights, and QALYs Within both treatment groups, we observed highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001) in the overall scores in the ICIQ-LUTSqol at 4 months (mean change Internet 4.8 [SD 6.1], Postal 4.6 [SD 6.7]), and at 1 year (mean change compared with baseline; Internet 5.3 [SD 6.4], Postal 4.5 [SD 6.4]).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensities correlates with the priming effect observed on the Aβ-induced Ca 2+ response: the fluorescence intensity in cells chronically incubated with Aβ 1–42 was not significantly different from the fluorescence measured in control cells, while the effect of previous chronic incubation on a subsequent acute Aβ 1–42 application was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Fig. 6G ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relationship between trophic preference (ICM) and historical change was very similar with no significant interaction (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.75) but showed a highly significant positive effect of ICM on historical change (ordinal logistic regression, p < 0.001, Figure 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For boys: Likelihood ratio test comparison between the full model (including age and direct BIS-BAS orientation score) and null model was highly significant ( Χ 2 (21) = 11.22, p < 0.001), with a main effect for the direct BIS-BAS orientation score (estimate ± SE = 0.22 ± 0.06, z = 3.28, p = .001), suggesting that BAS-oriented boys took ~80% of others’ resources.