Univariate test results revealed a highly significant and substantial main effect of Group on recognition speed [ F (2, 82) = 22.59, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.355].
Excerpts
Any cardiovascular event was documented in 37.8% of subjects from the low-risk group, 44.4% in the moderate-risk group, and 73.5% in the high-risk group, with the trend being statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Similarly, after excluding patients who died, the protective effect of antifungal treatment remained highly significant (OR < 0.001, 95% CI < 0.001–0.020, P < 0.001).
Differences were considered statistically significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01, extremely significant at *** p < 0.001, and very extremely significant at **** p < 0.0001.
A highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) is shown between the latter two groups.
1 A for statistical groupings.) Notably, there were no significant differences in alpha diversity values between the effluent samples at O’Brien and Calumet, or between the sewage samples at O’Brien and Calumet, although alpha diversity differences between the sewage and effluent types were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
However, tryptophan inadequacy was significantly higher among female-headed households (17.4%) compared to male-headed households (13%), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
The smooth term of the GAM was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Moreover, stimulus as a factor had a highly significant impact (F (1, 57) = 32.0, p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant difference (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.001) between these two groups with “within” distances being smaller than “between” distances ( Figure 3(A–B) ). 3.5.
The developer of the scale claimed the scale to be highly reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.872; item‒total correlations were reported to be highly significant = p < 0.001) and valid (CFI = 0.991; TLI = 0.981; RMSEA = 0.066).
Results The mean ICD of males and females was found to be 32.95 mm and 29.84 mm, respectively, and was statistically highly significant with a p value <0.001.
A highly significant association was observed between intrinsic subtypes and C/CMF treatment for DFS ( P interaction = 0.003 unadjusted, P = 0.001 adjusted) and OS ( P interaction = 0.04).
Thus, (iii) the total effect of tVNS plus SC-MIT (T1→T3) was also highly significant and, by convention, very large ( p < 0.001, d (Within) = 1.05; Figure 2a ).
The criterion for significance was set as p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in the statistics were accepted if p < 0.001.
A GLM analysis revealed a highly significant effect of aphid line on sex ratio ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the Plant hormone signal transduction pathway (ko04075) exhibited highly significant enrichment (p < 0.001).
This study showed that the correlation coefficients among SMD resistance data sets from the various environments were highly significant ( p < 0.001) at 0.26 ~ 0.91 ( Supplementary Table 10 ).
The size of the dots indicates the strength of the correlation and the color indicates the level of significance, with green indicating highly significant ( P < 0.001) and yellow indicating non-significant ( P > 0.05) (Fig. 5 J).
Both treatments showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001), along with large effect sizes (η2 = 0.659 for AgNPs and η2 = 0.952 for ZnONPs).
Differences in maximum length distributions were highly significant among matrices (KW, H = 163.5, p < 0.001).
Regarding spillovers, W × Ln RHI is positive and highly significant (b = 0.2455, p < 0.001), indicating that higher Ln RHI in neighboring provinces is associated with higher CCD (D) in the focal province.
Sperm count Results showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.001) in epididymal sperm number in sodium arsenite group compared to the control ( Table II ).
Prevalence of any predictive psychiatric disorder before lockdown was 20.5 % and within lockdown was 39.7 % and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001).
The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on mean log reduction (F(8, 235.22) = 1565.49; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.85) ( Figure 2 ).