Through RSM optimization (highly significant ( p < 0.001)), the optimal SAEW cleaning parameters were determined as follows: cleaning time of 35 s, cleaning temperature of 78 °C, and available chlorine concentration (ACC) of 108 mg/L.
Excerpts
Their results revealed a highly significant positive correlation between invasively measured systolic ( r = 0.763, p < 0.001) and diastolic ( r = 0.618, p < 0.001) central blood pressures and non-invasive BP readings.
Finally, the seasonal moving-average component (MA(12)) is highly significant (coefficient = − 0.821, p < 0.001), with a tight confidence interval from − 1.056 to − 0.586, entirely below zero.
The disparity was not statistically significant in OS ( P > 0.05), while the difference was extremely significant in CSS ( P < 0.001).
We found a highly significant increase over the 15-year period with regard to PPH (r = 0.200, p < 0.001) and cardiorespiratory instability (r = 0.282, p < 0.001), which stands in contrast to the other causes that remained unchanged over time.
Using the LMR cutoff (2.083), Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a pronounced survival separation: median survival was 2.7 months in the low-LMR group (≤2.083) versus 14.5 months in the high-LMR group (>2.083), with a highly significant log-rank difference ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
The control group also has denser connections that are typically of higher significance compared to the rifampicin group; however, all correlations are highly significant in this network ( r>0.65, p<0.001 ).
In the “Out-of-sample validation” section, the text “we obtained digitised maps of AADT” has been amended to “we obtained digitised maps of AADT (work day averages)”; the text “27 and 87 empirical AADT values” has been amended to “28 and 87 empirical AADT values”; the text “highly significant ( p < 0.001) and positive (0.60 and 0.70, respectively)” has been amended to “highly significant ( p < 0.005) and positive (0.55 and 0.70, respectively)”; the text “The percentage of observations that fell within the 90% prediction interval was 85.2%” has been amended to “The percentage of observations that fell within the 90% prediction interval was 89.3%”; and the text “These percentage dropped to 63.3% and 77.4%” has been amended to “These percentage dropped to 63.6% and 77.4%”.
Given the large number of isolate results included in the majority of analyses in this study, statistical analysis was not performed, as even subtle differences in percent resistance (<1%) to an antimicrobial agent for any time period or demographic parameters would be reported as highly significant ( P <0.001).
Relative Roles of Geographic and Environmental Isolation in Shaping Genetic Differentiation Mantel tests ( Figure 5 a,b) revealed a highly significant positive correlation between genetic and geographic distance ( r = 0.7274, p < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation between genetic and environmental distance ( r = 0.3613, p < 0.05).
The ANOVA result remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) when considering the valence dimension as well.
Biofilm formation was detected in 36 (87.8%) of UPEC compared to 4 (20%) in control isolates, which is statistically highly significant with p value < 0.001.
A highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was found for all the two-way interactions (D × P, D × S, and P × S) on embryo length, seed germination and epicotyl emergence ( Table S1 ).
There was a highly significant effect of diagnostic groups (F = 11.41, df = 9/577, p<0.001) explaining 12.4% of the variance in the data.
Statistical analysis of this difference is highly significant for both markers using two-way analysis of variance with region as a factor ( P <0.001).
The age effect, indicating an age-related decrease in performance, was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all disciplines and for both sexes.
Mean serum cTnT concentrations showed an increasing trend during the run, with a significant difference between 24-h run compared to concentration at baseline ( p < 0.001), marathon ( p < 0.001) and 12-h run ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 ).
The overall regression model is highly significant at the P < 0.001 level.
The F st of all pairwise analyses varied from 0.482 to 0.870 between populations in the ML reaches and those in the SW ( Table 3 ), showing highly significant difference ( P <0.001).
Only the differences between baseline eCO levels of active and passive cigarette smokers was not significant (p = 0.985) but comparisons among other groups were highly significant (p <0.001).
In our study, the differences in number of patients who could complete the 6MWT was statistically highly significant for both procedures ( P <.001).
Moreover, the effect size of the latter interaction was large, corresponding to an 11-point greater BDI-II increase with each log-unit of increased IL-6 for men than women, a highly significant finding ( p = 0.001).
When group B and Group C were compared at the first evaluation with their baseline scores, 0.4% (mean difference = 0.01 ± 0.05) and 2.3% (mean difference = 0.03 ± 0.03) reduction in plaque scores was observed, respectively, which was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
CT+ICI treatment caused a highly significant reduction in tumour volume (p<0.001; 33.7% decrease) compared to controls ( Fig. 5 D) and the combination of CT+ICI with anti-Gr1+ produced the most pronounced antitumour effect (p<0.001; 49.4% decrease, Fig. 5 E).
Temporal changes in dissolved oxygen in both ponds were highly significant (ANOVA, F (5,300) = 106.4, p < 0.001), falling progressively through January to less than 6 mg L −1 around 26 February 2017 and then abruptly increasing by more than 3 mg L −1 over two days.