Excerpts

Results of both were statistically evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t-test and considered significant ( P < 0.05), highly significant ( P < 0.01), or extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Proportion of low HGS was the greatest in the lowest quintile of serum vitamin E level (<10.51 mg/L, 57.1%), with a decreasing trend toward the highest vitamin E quintile (>17.81 mg/L, 43.6%; p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference was present if p ≤ 0.001.

Further quantification and statistical analysis of fluorescence intensity across groups demonstrated a highly significant difference between the control and dsRNA-treated groups ( P < 0.001) (Figure 4 C).

The statistical tests for all analyses remained highly significant ( p <0•001), suggesting that the results are robust to these alternative definitions of sleep problems.

The clonal and site effects had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.001) for all studied traits.

Results Germination trials: bird-ingested vs manually depulped seeds The comparisons of the germination rate between the bird-ingested and the manually depulped seeds were highly significant for the tree/shrub species (Wald χ 2 = 142.9, df = 3, P < 0.001; Fig. 3 ).

ANOVA showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of temperature stress and combined temperature-drought stress on all measured characteristics.

For colony A, the difference in mortality was highly significant between strains 119 and 49.3 (log‐rank test, p < .001) but not for colony B (log‐rank test, p = .017, Bonferroni adjusted significance level: p < .016) (Figure 1 ).

The 2-cluster solution was differently distributed over the 5 variables and according to the type of diagnoses (ICD-10; Table 1 ), and it was highly significant ( P< .001).

All three preoperative nutritional risk scores showed highly significant differences between the groups ( p < 0.001 for all).

Impact of Planting Date and Cultivars on the Duration of Phenological Phases The variance analysis of cycle duration (from VC to R7 stage) in calendar days (CD VC–R7) showed a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) of planting date, cultivar, and the interaction of these two factors ( Table 6 ).

In contrast, a highly significant statistical correlation between urinary phosphorus and protein intake was observed ( r = 0.73, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b ).

the left in LC 3, and the right in LC 4, determining a highly significant hand x loading condition effect: F (3, 57)=14.94; p < 0.001.

Although marginally significant ( p = 0.001), the height of transgenic plants was only 8% lower than that of Columbia compared to ∼40% reduction seen in 3KO plants (Figure 1 E).

Regarding our main analysis, i.e., comparison between CSF-lactate measured either by the blood gas analyzer or the reference method, we calculated a Pearson correlation index of 0.94 (highly significant correlation on a two-sided significance testing ( p < 0.001)) (Fig. 2 ).

There is a statistically highly significant of positive correlation with moderate strength between total knowledge scale and total perception scale (p value < 0.001).

The differences between races showed weaker linear trends, with Caucasians (57.5%) showing an increasing trend, and African Americans (24.3%) and Hispanics (11.8%) having a decreasing trend (p < 0.001).

34 Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t -test with statistical significance assigned at * P < 0.05 (significant), ** P < 0.01 (moderately significant), and *** P < 0.001 (highly significant).

Students receiving multiple interventions had higher scores on the pre-test as compared to those receiving a single intervention (P<0.001 for all comparisons among groups), and they demonstrated an increasing trend of awareness about gambling over time (P<0.001 for multiple interventions; P = 0.538 for single intervention).

BE/BT and BE/Bd also provide no significant differences when a Bonferroni’s correction is applied) have highly significant scores ( p value<0.001) thus confirming the significance of the separation between the two groups.

Differences were regarded as statistically significant and as statistically highly significant if p values were <0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively.

Comparisons between Child–Pugh A and Child–Pugh C, as well as between Child–Pugh B and Child–Pugh C, were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In models accounting for population structure (model-B), the effect of population structure was highly significant for all studied traits ( p < 0.001), except for CELL and HEM (Table S1).

Taking “the velvety sensation of the first assessment “as an example, the fixed-effects test results showed that the main effect of wine sample was highly significant (F(3, 96) = 19.568, p < 0.001), indicating significant differences in velvety sensation among the wine samples; the main effect of repetition was not significant (F(1, 96) = 0.754, p = 0.387), suggesting no systematic bias between the two replicate assessments; and the interaction between wine sample and repetition was not significant (F(3, 96) = 0.534, p = 0.660), indicating that the pattern of changes across the two assessments was consistent for all wine samples.