Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001, two-tail t-Test; at 5% level of significance) was observed later after 36 h of incubation in Kuroshio and STG samples (Table 2 ).
Excerpts
In comparison to the controls and the prior shorter treatments times of 30 s and 60 s these reductions were highly significant (p<0,001).
The difference in paternal age between non-Down syndrome and Down syndrome babies was highly significant in both samples: t = 12.94 (P < 0.001) in California and t = 5.04 (P < 0.001) in the Czech Republic.
There were highly significant differences in food and water intake between the NC and diabetic rats (p < 0.001).
Analysis of variance revealed that the environment had a highly significant effect on the GI of the WJ RIL population (F = 25.019, P < 0.001), whereas no significant environmental difference was observed on the GI of the WZ RIL population ( Table 4 ). 3.3 Allelic variation of TaMFT-3A and TaMKK3-4A in the two RIL populations KASP markers were used to detect the genotypes of TaMFT-3A and TaMKK3-4A to determine the distribution frequencies of the different SNP loci in the two RIL populations ( Figure 3 ).
This difference was highly significant (p<0,001).
Differences became significant at 17 weeks for PlGF (P = 0.009) alone, and were highly significant for PlGF and the sFLT-1/PIGF ratio at 24 weeks (P < 0.001).
In presurgical samples, a highly significant negative correlation was observed between the relative abundance of Firmicutes and that of Bacteroidetes ( r = −0.815, p < 0.001).
Also, a highly significant positive correlation was detected between iPTH and CXCL16 (r =-0.403, p<0.001) ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).
However, in our cohort of dogs, we observed a highly significant positive correlation between these parameters (r = 0.716, p < 0.001).
On the basis of the number of participants in the two groups who moved from offender to non-offender status during the follow-up period, the highly significant effect of treatment ( P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) is 0.32 to 0.49 (Cramer, a medium to large effect).
Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (time sequence ARDS vs. basal value, BV; all p < 0.001 for each parameter respectively, in both lavaged groups), but comparable between the lavaged groups.
Statistical significance was defined as non-significant ( ns p value < 0.05), significant (* p value ≤ 0.05), very significant (** p value ≤ 0.01), and highly significant (*** p value ≤ 0.001).
The highly significant F-values for fruit weight and physicochemical features ( p < 0.001) suggested that apple genotypes accounted for a significant proportion of variance in the dependent traits.
A highly significant negative correlation was found between those two values (r= − 0.812, p < 0.001).
The data indicate that the NFG group shows highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the height variable compared to both EMG and NMG groups.
In contrast, the difference in median survival from the first dose of antibody of patients with or without TP53 alterations was highly significant, at 0.7 versus 5.1 years, respectively ( p < 0.001).
Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001) for the dataset, as well as for both subsets.
The genotype of gilts had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) on BF1 (backfat thickness 1), BF2 (backfat thickness 2), and MLD (depth of the back muscle), while it showed no significant influence on AET (age at the end of the test) ( p > 0.05).
The two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) interaction parameters for all strains when considering the exposure to pulsed lavage and the reincubation of the samples as factors ( Supplementary Data Tables 1, 2 ).
Post-challenge, liver TAC displayed a highly significant enhancement ( P < 0.001) in the DBSFM -treated groups compared to the control.
The main effect of TASK was highly significant ( F = 16.601, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.293).
Across the four datasets, the association was similarly strong ( r ≥ 0.80) and highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a sharp increase in the number of actual barriers displayed starting already for cases with 1–2 functional limitations.
Although two studies reported non-statistically significant results for the primary endpoints [ 37 , 38 ], the pronounced effect observed by Demain and Goetz [ 39 ] ( p = 0.0002) strongly influenced Fisher’s combined analysis, resulting in a highly significant global p -value ( p < 0.001).
Indeed, a highly significant inverse correlation between the MTA3 and SOX2 levels ( r 2 = 0.534, P < 0.001 and r 2 = 0.624, P < 0.001, respectively; Figures 3B,C ) was observed.