Except for Castorimorpha and Anomaluromorpha, all P-values of the 4 topology-based indices of whole-tree symmetry (IC, M Π *, M σ *, B1) within rodent subclades (Myomorpha, Sciuroidea, Ctenohystrica) ranged from significant (P <0.05) to highly significant (P <0.001).
Excerpts
Estimates of beta diversity and dispersion suggested that the highly significant differences in diversity observed between age and location groups ( P < 0.001) are not due to the variation in homogeneity between the groups ( P > 0.1).
All p values were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that observed agreement exceeded what would be expected by chance for every variable.
7e ), a highly significant overrepresentation ( χ 2 = 271,032, P < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 1.25).
In our case, all species pairs showed highly significant ( P <0.001) genotypic differentiation (see also [34] ).
For wrist flexion, handle type had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001, Table 2 ), with handles A, B, and E producing the highest flexion angles (46.24°, 43.86°, and 41.33°, respectively).
EtOH showed significant (*P < 0.05) at 200 mg (5.59 ± 0.29), (**P < 0.01) at 300 mg (4.47 ± 0.46), and highly significant (***P < 0.001) at 400 mg (3.34 ± 0.18) results when compared to the Diseased group (Table 4 and Fig. 8 ).
Paired t-tests comparison of PPFILB-OXAI method with respect to different traditional methods shows highly significant p-values (all p< 0.001) signifying that the performance differences are statistically significant.
extremely significantqualified
The p -value of <0.05 was considered a significant difference, while p < 0.01 was considered as highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered as extremely significant. 5.
The level of significance “ P ” value at 95% confidence interval was calibrated as: Nonsignificant (NS): P >0.05, Significant (S): 0.01 < P < 0.05 and highly significant (HS): P <0.001.
The result shows that there is a highly significant difference (value of p < 0.001) between the tolerant and the susceptible genotypes confirming the outcomes observed with electrophoresis.
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 highly significant, and p < 0.001 extremely significant.
Similarly, pooling 13 studies on male athletes yielded a medium-to-large, highly significant effect (ES = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.37, 1.20; p < 0.001).
showed a trendP ≤ 0.001
In addition, Bifidobacterium showed a trend of significant reduction in relative abundance from local controls → hospitalized non-COVID patients → COVID patients (0.17% versus 0.03% versus 0.002%, P ≤ 0.001).
showed a trendp = 0.0010
Notably, we confirmed significantly decreased NE levels in the spinal cord of SMNΔ7 mice at P6 and showed a trend towards reduction of this neurotransmitter levels at P3, compared to the age-matched WT littermates (genotype, F (1,49) = 12.31, p = 0.0010; age×genotype, F (2,49) = 2.923, p = 0.0632; P3, p = 0.0938; P6, p = 0.0003; Fig. 4g ; Supplementary Table 4 ).
Wearing a glove leads to a highly significant increase of force reduction from 61.6 N/s in the baseline condition to 89.5 N/s in the glove condition (PostHoc: t (21) = − 6.8, p < 0.001, d = − 1.5, BF 10 > 100).
To examine the children in the proximity of cutoff thresholds, we also used the 80th percentile cutoff point (ie, abnormal or border range), which showed that 36 (97%) children were above the cutoff point at baseline, while the respective figure at the 24-month follow-up was 23 (62%), indicating a highly significant change ( P <.001, McNemar test).
For each model, the Hausman test yields a highly significant result ( p < 0.001), indicating that a fixed effects model is preferred over a random effects specification.
All spatial models were found to be highly significant ( p -value < 0.001).
The K values decreased further in the postoperative period and the change was highly significant ( P < 0.001) as compared to preoperative value but not significant ( P = 0.059) when compared to intraoperative values. α-angle (which represents the speed of solid clot formation) measured at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time points had mean values of 54.80 ± 5.40 min, 61.94 ± 7.87 min, and 68.57 ± 5.70 min, respectively [ Table 3 ].
Likewise, we observed a decreasing trend in both sexes (male and female, APC = −7.6% and −5.1%, respectively; p -value < 0.001).
Comparing the mean ESS of the 12 patients before and after 1 month of treatment: 3.99 versus 2.79, the decrease was 1.20 in the ESS score, being highly significant with a p < 0.001 (***).
The results of one-way ANOVA showed that the data had extremely significant statistical significance ( p < 0.001).
Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by HF status continued to show highly significant differences at the threshold of 7000 for NT-proBNP, for all-cause death, cardiac death, and HF hospitalization (log-rank p < 0.001). 4.
For PETG, the ANOVA on mean width deviation ( Table 6 ) revealed a highly significant effect of the process parameters (F = 42.304, p < 0.001), confirming the findings from the main and interaction plots.