Both linear regressions were highly significant (males: F = 107.32, P < 0.001; females: F = 76.90, P < 0.001).
Excerpts
According to the p -value, differences were considered as significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), or highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.
30 Before the availability of ACPA testing, a seminal study of over 2000 healthy INA monitored biannually for up to 19 years revealed a highly significant association between RF level and RA development (p<0.001, controlling for age and sex). 60 Genotype also confers additional risk of ACPA and RA in FDRs of INA populations.
Cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in 15.2% of the previous sphincterotomy group, 9.3% of the sphincterotomy and stent group, and 6.1% of the ERCP-naïve group, with a highly significant p -value of <0.001.
A total score of two or more was associated with complications with sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 82% and a highly significant association of 47% (kappa coefficient, P < 0.001).
The effect of time was highly significant across all language measures (all P < .001), indicating continuous recovery over time.
Both reductions were highly significant compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
One-way ANOVA showed a highly significant difference in the drug release profile of the formulations and free drug, that is, ciprofloxacin ( P < 0.001).
A significant difference ( P < 0.05) between groups at all considered time points was evidenced through Kruskal–Wallis test when analyzing the full genome with, a highly significant difference detected only at 3 wpi ( P < 0.001).
There was a highly significant variation (p = 0.001) between body condition score and infection rate of intestinal nematodes [ Table 2 ].
The Friedman test indicated highly significant differences between DeepSeek-R1 and both OpenAI o1 (p < 0.001) and Grok3 (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between OpenAI o1 and Grok3 (p = 1.000)( Figure 2a ).
Significant GCA effects for parents and SCA effects for families were observed for most traits and all variance components were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).
However, there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between both these conditions and the percentage of neutrophils internalising organisms in the ‘no serum’ samples.
Separate analyses showed that this occurred because the interaction was highly significant for cavity-nesting species ( t 34 = −3.659, P < 0.001), significant for ground-nesting species ( t 22 = −2.376, P = 0.016) and non-significant for branch nesting species ( t 75 = −0.838, P = 0.253).
The results were considered; nonsignificant when the probability of error is more than 5% ( P > 0.05), significant when the probability of error is <5% ( P ≤ 0.05) and highly significant when the probability of error is <0.1% ( P ≤ 0.001).
Based on the results of the Cochran–Armitage test for trend, there was an increasing trend in ICR between the three groups ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
Results for R2 were different with highly significant values of all datasets (p < 0.001) but highest correlation values of the reanalysis products.
Notably, we found at 300 min a progressive and highly significant increase of FGF-21 in the remaining 15 participants, who had an isolated lipid infusion over a total of 300 min ( P < 0.001; data not shown).
The difference between the two conditions remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) when the data were analyzed without outlier removal. 3.
Results All mARC plans were considered valid for treatment and yielded a highly significant improvement in the CI over 3D-CRT plans (p <0.001).
For the EOS, a likelihood ratio test showed that the interaction between flow regime and drought status was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 10.59, p = 0.001).
Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test confirmed that these differences between pre- and post-intervention scores were highly significant across all items ( p < 0.001).
This analysis confirmed that temperature had a highly significant effect on global gene expression (F 1,40 = 6.41, P = 0.001).
In the patients grouped by hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, we observed extremely significant differences in mean age ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, after Bonferroni multiple comparison correction (with the significance threshold set at p < 0.0083), the associations for manganese and vitamin C remained highly significant (both p -values < 0.001), while the associations for the other components did not reach the corrected significance level.