Statistically significant changes were classified as significant (*) when p < 0.05, more significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001 as compared with the control group and significant (^) when p < 0.05, more significant (^^) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (^^^) when p < 0.001 as compared with the inflammation group.
Excerpts
There was an increasing trend with the average annual increase rate of $1.23 ( P < 0.001).
In the genu valgum group, the MAR improved from 0.753 (range 0.35-1.67) to 0.14 (range 0.01-0.33), while in the genu varum group it changed from 1.02 (range 0.7-1.45) to 0.211 (range 0.05-0.72) both of which were highly significant with P < 0.001 [Tables 2 and 3 ].
When DIN SRT was expressed as the function of the poorer ear PTA, the correlation was highly significant ( R = 0.82, p < 0.001) and comparable with the English antiphasic DIN test ( R = 0.82) ( 31 ) using the same protocol on a different population with different language.
An initial analyses of variance for repeated measures showed a highly significant effect of hours of insect herbivory (P < 0.001), and also a highly significant interaction between hours of insect herbivory and plant treatment (P = 0.001).
The adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) ranged from 1.14 (UC) to 1.30 (IBD-unclassified), all highly significant (p < 0.001).
This confirmed a highly significant difference between groups ( F 1,11 = 29.7, P < 0.001), with no interaction between group and structure ( F 2,22 = 2.28, P = 0.13), or group and hemisphere ( F 1,11 = 2.6, P = 0.13).
Intra-Morphotype Variations in Respiratory Metabolic Rates Across Three Temporal Intervals in a Day As shown in Figure 2 , the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences in respiratory metabolic rates (RMRs) among the three time intervals for both the males and fundatrices ( p < 0.001).
different = 2), as an additional level 1 predictor in a second step produced a highly significant effect for this variable, β = 34.21, t = 9.30, p < 0.001, and it rendered the effect for the CL variable non-significant, β = 0.59, t = 0.28, p = 0.78.
Total chlamydospore formation in potentially malignant cases was highly significant ( P <0.001) in corn meal broth + 5% milk in comparison to serum milk [ Table 4 ].
A highly significant difference in cAMP- and IP 3 baseline levels was detected at ZT 1, 9, 16, 18, 20, and 23 (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001).
Indeed, in both AMO-1 and MOLP-8 cells, highly significant inhibition of constitutive Akt phosphorylation ( P <0.001 compared with vehicle-treated controls) was observed at concentrations of as low as 10 nM ( Figure 3a ).
Among infant biomarkers, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation between infant CRP and AGP, MPO, and LCN-2, and finally, MPO and CALPR (Table S3).
For the twelve counties with n > 20 for both the hunter records and our field surveys, we found a highly significant effect of survey method ( F = 86.9, df = 1, p < .001) with hunter records reporting lower proportions of melanism, on average, compared to our field surveys (see below).
Correlation of items within factors was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both meteorism and flatulence (correlation coefficient 0.46) as well as for pain and nausea (0.53), hence convergent validity was supported.
Moreover, silymarin (group V) pretreatment produced highly significant reduction ( P < 0.001) in serum AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GT and bilirubin level.
The 2 parameters showed a highly significant linear correlation (r=0.980; p<0.001) and the standard error in the estimate of TAPSE using the RVOTFS values was ±1.34 mm.
There was no linear trend between marital assets and marital age in (a) uneducated women (Spearman’s coefficient 0.01, p = 0.631), those with (b) primary (−0.06, p = 0.272) or (c) lower-secondary education (0.01, p = 0.868), but a positive trend among those with (d) secondary or higher education (0.14, p < 0.001).
For evaluation of horizontal deviation, the manual PACT measurement and automated eye track system show a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.932, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 ).
Multiple regression analysis for “Reference Angle α” by instrument position shows highly significant differences between violin position A1 and all other instrument positions ( N = 90, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.353).
The results of analysis of variance show a very highly significant difference in the total aerobic mesophilic flora (TAMF) from one Gbeli sample to another ( p < 0.001).
The log-rank test indicates a highly significant result, with p < 0.001.
Although the parameter estimate for a linear effect on Digit Span was highly significant ( p = 0.001), most of the outcomes did not exhibit statistically significant linear trends, perhaps because much of the performance decline had already occurred within the lowest cumulative exposure category, resulting in a nonlinear relationship over the observed range of cumulative exposure.
The study found a highly significant 3-year overall survival (OS) advantage for the CRT arm (76% vs 46%, P<0.001).
Intergroup comparison using the Mann–Whitney U-test showed a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 and Figure 1 ].