Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ACE The most striking 2–2.5-year post-blast finding was the pronounced role of childhood adversities, a highly significant predictor across all PTSD outcomes (full: OR = 3.56, p < 0.001; 5 symptoms: OR = 3.21, p < 0.001; definition 1: OR = 2.71, p < 0.001; 2 cluster: OR = 2.32, p = 0.004; majority: OR = 2.40, p = 0.001; 6 symptoms: OR = 2.04, p = 0.008), in contrast to its non-significance at 6–7 months post-blast. 5.
an overall trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Similarly, when we examined the proportion of individuals in each of the four groups who had levels above the two cutpoints in clinical use (0.3 and 2.0), we observed an overall trend toward a greater number of people above the cutpoint as AKI status went from 0/3 to 3/3 (P < 0.001 for overall trend; Figure 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As treatment progressed, the between-group differences became progressively significant: at T1, LysoPC(18:1) and arachidonic acid showed significant differences ( p < 0.01), while L-tryptophan and citric acid reached p < 0.05, and at T2, all four biomarkers showed highly significant between-group differences (LysoPC(18:1) and arachidonic acid: p < 0.001; L-tryptophan and citric acid: p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Prior to examining the improvements in the mean 90% amplitudes of trunk sway, the BCI and DHI values with VTfb balance training for the separate DO and QBD populations, we established, with repeated measures of ANOVAs, that a highly significant time effect was present in the BCI and DHI scores (F = 34.2 and 18.5, respectively, p < 0.001) for the combined data of both groups. 3.1.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, pairwise comparisons showed that this overall difference was driven primarily by the dietary contrast, as all ND-versus-HFD-based comparisons were highly significant (R 2 = 0.281–0.404, p = 0.001), whereas the high-dose probiotic group did not differ significantly from the HFD control group (HFD vs.
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Discussion In this study, a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.992, P = 0.001) was observed between DM accumulation and the R/FR ratio in the different spectral profiles provided by the different colored films, indicating that the DM accumulation was greatly affected by far-red light in G. longituba .
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding the correlation of DPPH with hydroxycinnamic acids, this was highlighted by the existence of highly significant correlations ( p < 0.001) with four of these compounds, namely, 11 , 13 , 15 , and 24 ( r = 0.866, 0.870, 0.899, and 0.852, respectively), all of them assigned as acetyl- p -coumaroylsucrose derivatives; strongly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with three of them, namely, 3, 5, and 7 ( r = 0.776, 0.845, and 0.837, respectively); and significant correlations ( p < 0.05) with compounds 2, 12, 14, and 22 ( r = 0.689, 0.691, 0.708, and 0.645, respectively).
a significant trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
There was a significant trend for lower screening time and lower radiation dose in more recent procedures (Pearson's Correlation Coefficient −0.45, p < 0.001 and −0.29, p = 0.002, respectively). 4.3 Follow-up and arrhythmia recurrence Follow-up data are presented in Table 4 .