On the other hand, the values of total N content in CGE and GDE were similar but highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to total N content in OGR (Table 2 ).
Excerpts
The Chi-square test was highly significant refuting the null hypothesis of an equal distribution of visitors among treatments (χ 2 (0.05,2) = 50.1, P<0.001, two tail test).
The overall model effect was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a standard error of estimate of 14.42 mL/min.
A highly significant association between worse patient outcome (overall survival and disease free survival) and negative CADM1 protein expression could be found in both data sets (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006) (Figure 4 ).
The correlation between plant diversity and soil properties NMDS ordinations results showed that El, WC, TN and SOM had a highly significant effect on plant diversity ( p = 0.001).
Both its linear and quadratic effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The application of co-variance analysis, with various measures or indices of body composition as covariants, indicates that the highly significant differences observed between women with PCOS vs. controls for plasma insulin, HOMA-IR index, and QUICKI (all p < 0.001) were completely abolished (NS) only after adjusting for visceral fat among the various central adiposity indices, as well as after adjusting for the android/gynoid fat ratio ( Table 4 ).
Both the main effects of species and desiccation treatment, as well as their interaction, were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) for all ChlaF traits, demonstrating strong species-specific variation in PSII sensitivity to desiccation stress.
In this best model, the smooth term of the interaction between week of year and latitude was a highly significant predictor ( p < 0.001).
For self-worth, the overall model was highly significant, F (8, 186) = 27.436, p < 0.001, explaining 54.1% of the variance.
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on seasonal disease pressure (p < 0.001), whereas the effect of year was not significant (Table 3 ).
Consistently for both subgroups and all speech conditions (bw8, bw16, fw8, fw16), driving input on A1 and Pv was highly significant (A1: p < 0.001, Pv: p < 0.01; corr.) ( Fig 5A , Table 3 ).
Statistically highly significant data, with a P < 0.001, are marked by ***.
There was a highly significant difference in total coliform result before and after the intervention ( p < 0.001, Table 2 ).
The relationship between air and water temperatures was highly significant (adjusted R 2 = 0.83, F (1, 26) = 133.3, P <0.001) (see figure S1 ).
Next, we investigated human HCC gene expression data and discovered a highly significant, positive correlation between CTNNB1 and BCL6 ( r = 0.527, P < 0.001) or MEF2C transcript levels ( r = 0.504, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Figure S5H ), and a highly significant, positive correlation between hypoxia‐ inducible factor ( HIF ) 1A and BCL6 ( r = 0.405, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Figure S5I ).
For the entire dataset, quartiles were: Q25 = 0.32, Q50 = 0.37, and Q75 = 0.44, but the within breed values ( Table 2 .) are much more informative because breed differences are highly significant (F 2,9200 = 930.1, P<0.001).
The drop in mean insecticide concentration between three to six months and 14-20 months was highly significant (p < 0.001 by Bonferroni test), but there was little additional loss of insecticide between 14-20 and 26-32 months (p = 0.294).
Compared with non-PDF, the association between PDF3 and BDD was highly significant (adjusted OR=5.74, 95% CI 4.57 to 7.21, p<0.001).
A two-way ANOSIM test confirmed that differences between survey period were highly significant (Global R: 0.764, P = 0.001) and all pairwise comparisons between periods were significant ( P <0.05).
Figure 2a shows the changes in motility index in the pre- and post-Katrina populations and reveals a decreasing trend at a P < 0.001 significance.
The interaction between year and site was highly significant ( P < 0.001), reflecting a much stronger interannual increase in fruit removal at Campo than at Mbalmayo (Fig. 4 ).
The results revealed a highly significant interaction between temperature and starch type (F(18, 56) = 48.62, P < 0.001), confirming that the modified starches responded differently to increasing temperature.
Focusing instead on the shorter ORF3d-2 isoform, this protein contains zero predicted epitopes, which is a highly significant depletion given its own amino acid content (p=0.001) and compared to short unannotated ORFs (p=0.001).
Second, repeated-measures mixed models confirmed that Location, Stage, and Time of day, and all interactions, were highly significant ( p < 0.001).