Correlation between integral and peak RLUs A highly significant correlation (correlation coefficient, R = 0.995, P < .001) was observed between integral and peak CL responses, irrespective of the treatments administered ( Figure 2 ).
Excerpts
AMOVA ( Table 2 ) showed highly significant genetic differentiation among species as well as among populations within species ( P < 0.001 in both cases).
Both correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001).
When considering MRA use based on calendar year, there was a significant trend for increased MRA prescription at discharge among MRA‐eligible patients over time ( P <0.001) (Figure 2 ).
Moreover, in the young and old age groups ( N = 19 and N = 237, respectively), a highly significant difference in CRP levels was observed (Z = −3.970, p < 0.001).
The OD-CW and OD-WW regressions were highly significant ( p < 0.001) with R 2 values of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively ( Figure 3 and Table 3 ).
There was a highly significant reduction in eggs/g soil between both 15 and 22.5°C and also between the latter temperature and 25°C ( p < .001, univariate anova , Figure 3 a).
In most cases, this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with the exception of SNP assay 5 (Wnt-4), SNP assay 9 (Spr-1) and SNP assay 11 (Spr-2) (Figure 4 , Table 5 ).
Results show that the PhiPT value of 0.73 is highly significant ( p = .001).
Daily averaged CO data for Xi'an were obtained from the Chinese Air Quality online Monitoring and Analysis Platform ( CAQMAP, 2020 ), and we found that the daily averaged CO 2 and CO have a highly significant ( p < 0.001) linear relationship ( Fig. 2 ).
This difference was highly significant at p < 0.001 ( Figure 1A ).
reported remission of NAFLD in 56% of patients undergoing VSG, with a highly significant association between NAFLD remission and achieving greater than 50% excess weight loss (odds ratio 10.1, p < 0.001), further stressing the relationship between effective weight loss and liver disease resolution [ 38 ].
The difference between two mean values was analyzed by Student's t -test and was considered as statistically significant in case of P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant for P < 0.001 (**).
However, for international collaborations outside South America, there was an increasing trend over the years (p < 0.001).
LMEM yielded highly significant scores for Y (t = −15.6, p<<0.001), Z (t = −10.4, p<<0.001), and Y:Z (t = −32, p<<0.001) directions.
We find highly significant reductions (P< 0.001) in ARF expression during disease progression from normal oesophageal epithelium to Barrett's Oesophagus to adenocarcinoma, with 57/76 (75%) adenocarcinomas displaying undetectable levels of ARF expression.
This confirmed a highly significant difference between groups ( F 1,11 = 29.7, P < 0.001), with no interaction between group and structure ( F 2,22 = 2.28, P = 0.13), or group and hemisphere ( F 1,11 = 2.6, P = 0.13).
The mean haemoglobin level and haematocrit, immediately after surgery, showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.001) from the baseline value.
The next finding lies in the positive and highly significant path coefficient (β = 0.42, P < 0.001) that links medical students’ beliefs about the impact of AI on medicine to their behavioral intention.
This difference of CE infection in various age groups of animals was highly significant ( x 2 = 121.225; p = 0.001) (Table 2 ).
IgG3 alone or in combination with IgG1 has increased potential to cause in vivo hemolysis and highly significant ( p < 0.001) abnormal values of hemolytic laboratory analytes (hemoglobin, bilirubin and LDH).
This increase attained statistical significance at 12 hpi ( p < 0.05) and demonstrated a highly significant difference at 24 hpi ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 B).
Finally, we demonstrated a highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between immune checkpoint expression and TPCDS, with notable co-expression among immune checkpoints (Fig. 7 J).
In the last hour of the observation period, a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in lying time in the lateral position was detected compared to the three previous intervals (4–3 h; 3–2 h; 2–1 h) ( Figure 3 A).
This analysis revealed that the genotype effect on the FA values was highly significant (p < 0.001).