The difference between the areas under the curves of the WT and Hvcn1 -/- cells was highly significant (p<0.001).
Excerpts
Analysis of variance showed that the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001).
Additive and dominance effects for individual SNPs were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and nearly identical across the linkage group 2C haploblock within each population (File S3).
The Wilcoxon test indicates highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences in the individual parameter values of V max and Km between the tCRS groups.
The results obtained are considered highly significant for P <0.001, significant for P <0.01, and insignificant for P <0.05 or P >0.05.
The F u,cont values increased with an increasing wall thickness for the test groups, and all the pairwise test data were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
This was highly significant ( P <0.001) for the interaction between trial 4 (4×MIC) and time for L . monocytogenes , S . aureus and S .
RT-PCR results compared to chip results As a quality control measure, correlation of data between the GeneChip and QPCR was highly significant (P < 0.001) indicating internal consistency.
The overall association was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and no evidence of non-linearity was observed, as indicated by a non-significant P -value (>0.05) from the likelihood ratio test comparing nested linear and non-linear models.
Before the implementation of the policies, the consumption of oral PPIs exhibited a slightly increasing trend (β 0 = 0.14, p < 0.001).
A two-tailed Student’s t-test indicated that the difference in total CFU was highly significant ( P <0.001).
The survival analysis, which includes all participants, demonstrated a highly significant difference in survival between sexes (P<0.001), with males exhibiting better survival outcomes.
Figure 2a statistically reveals highly significant differences of DES between the two prompt strategies ( p < 0.001, | d | = 1.228), with P2 achieving higher mean efficiency than P1 (0.48 vs. 0.23).
In model M1, the KMO index was satisfactory, with the value = 0.863, and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity showed a highly significant (χ 2 = 1272.29, df = 91, p -value <0.001).
of borderline significancep = 0.021
The CRP level showed a highly significant correlation with tumor stage ( p = 0.001) and an association of borderline significance with smoking ( p = 0.021), whereas no statistically significant associations were observed between CRP levels and age or sex ( Figure S1 ).
The 3 × 3 ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect for buildings, F (2, 99) = 19.175, p < 0.001, showing that there were overall differences in absolute elevator use between the different intervention buildings.
Statistic differences were significant at 0.01 < p < 0.05, very significant at 0.001 < p < 0.01 and extremely significant at 0.0001 ≤ p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001. 3.
One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of lifestyle on attitudes of women toward milk donation ( F (2, 1220) = 601.2383, p < 0.001) (see Table A5 b).
Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection to assess GFI1 expression levels by quantitative RT-PCR, revealing a highly significant down regulation of both GFI1 RNA (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A ).
While GCS at admission had no influence on PH rates ( p = 0.356), its predictive value for overall mortality remains highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The results showed that exposure of the organotypic cultures to Aβ1-42 peptide caused a highly significant increase in GFAP immunocontent ( P < 0.001; Figure 6A and B ).
The final model was highly significant ( F = 50.132, p < 0.001).
In the program testing, universal genetic codes, the HKY85 evolution model and 31 quantitative biochemical properties were used to estimate adaptive selection (referred to as positive destabilizing selection, when the frequency of changes in magnitude categories 6, 7 and 8 were highly significant, z-scores > 3.09 and P < 0.001).
The change was highly significant ( p = 0.001).
= 0.73, P < 0.001). In the total sample, a highly significant correlation between the MBQ and PMS scores ( r = 0.397, P < 0.001) indicated that the more severe the PMS the more severe the blues.