Excerpts

Analyses of variance showed that genotype, the duration of cold treatment and their interactions were highly significant (P < 0.001) for LT 50 and FLN indicating that there were measurable differences in the response to cold treatment (Figure 1 and Table 1 ). 2.1 Vernalization response Vernalization is the acceleration of the competence to flower by cold-adapted plants upon exposure for a period of time to low non-freezing temperature.

All t -tests were highly significant (all p < .001).

* p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 was highly significant difference and *** p < 0.001 extremely significant difference.

Results Pain experience Stepwise multivariable regression analyses resulted in an AIC-minimized model in which only the recollected pain score of the previous mammogram was a highly significant (p < .001) predictor for the reported pain scores (Model 1 in Table 1 ).

There was a highly significant statistical difference in severity of FIC between Groups A, B and C ( P < 0.001).

The mean length-to-width ratio varied from 1.520 -+ 0.376 SD to 1.858 +- 0.678 and always showed a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) over nonsheared controls (1.111 --_ 0.143 to 1.187 - 0.250).

Electron probe X-ray microanalysis also showed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlation of P with mitochondrial Ba, in an estimated elemental ratio of approximately 3 Ba/4 P.

The second post-contrast imaging time showed a trend of higher ECV-values than the first time point, with an absolute deviation of 0.014 ± 0.016 for MOLLI ( p < 0.001), 0.008 ± 0.013 for SAPPHIRE ( p < 0.02), and 0.005 ± 0.020 for SASHA ( p = 0.24).

In 9 out of 10 treatments where fusion proceeded extensively, the aggrega- tion of IMP was judged as highly significant by this technique (P< 0.001 in 8, P< 0.01 in 1, and P< 0.1 in 1).

Although reduced, emotional interference was still highly significant in the post-test, F (1,51) = 13.198, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.206.

In model M1, the KMO index was satisfactory, with the value = 0.863, and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity showed a highly significant (χ 2 = 1272.29, df = 91, p -value <0.001).

Another highly significant difference exists for alkaline phosphatase at 0-3 months, between Groups III and IV (with skeletal and hepatic metastases) and all the other groups (P = 0 001).

P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant difference, P value of <0.01 was considered to be highly significant difference and P value of <0.001 was considered to be extremely significant difference.

CNS relapse did not produce a significant decrease in remission length (P greater than 0.1) but reduction in survival after CNS relapse was highly significant (P = 0.001).

Additional analysis of the data using two-sample t tests for each of the four census years (see Section 3), also confirmed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference between the asset wealth (SEP) levels of the two sets of households that was constant for the entire period.

Task modality exhibited a highly significant main effect across all multimodal metrics (all p < 0.001), suggesting that different agricultural operations were associated with distinct neural, visual, and autonomic response patterns within the present cohort.

The differences were re- flected as significantly higher than ex- pected mean grades for Sq.M (P < 0 05 and P < 0-001 respectively). A Friedman non-parametric analysis of variance of ratio of observed mean grade to expected mean grade of Sq.M was carried out for groups I to 24 and the results showed: (1) a highly significant increase with dose level of SWS or fraction (P < 0.001).

A one-sided t-test to determine whether the difference between the predicted and actual chronological age was less than 2.0 years was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This difference between the APOE4 and the APOE3 cells is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Feeding treatments had also a highly significant influence on the albumen height and yolk color ( p < 0.001).

Table 1 shows a statistically highly significant difference between preoperative and long-term follow-up according to the IPSS, QOL, Q max , PVR, prostate volume, and PSA ( P < 0.001) [ Figure 1 ].

For male candidates, the accuracy of GEBV was lower for 500 (− 40.0%) and 250 (− 65.8%) SNPs than the accuracy obtained with 1000 SNPs but the increases in gain for genomic scenarios based on 250 and 500 SNPs, compared to the classical design, were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Furthermore, Egger’s test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value < 0.001 ( Table 4 ). 3.5.

CKO mice also exhibited a lower VO 2 ( p = 0.04) but without a significant difference in VCO 2 ( p = 0.348), yet with a highly significant increase in RER ( p < 0.001).

Specifically, the addition of T1 mapping yielded a highly significant NRI of 0.948 (95% CI: 0.528–1.367, p < 0.001) and an IDI of 0.099 (95% CI: 0.008–0.189, p = 0.033).