Specifically, SLC1A5 showed significant differential expression ( P < 0.01), while FASN, ALAD, and CD36 exhibited a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).
Excerpts
3A ), this reduction was highly significant only for non-enriched HD mice (HD: F[1,38] = 22.29, P < 0.001; 2-way ANOVA).
Marked positive correlations were identified between chemerin and coronary severity indices, including severity score ( P < 0.001; highly significant), Gensini score ( P = 0.001), and plaque burden percentage ( P < 0.001; highly significant).
Furthermore, forced overexpression of RORC (Model + Lovastatin + OE and OE alone) resulted in a highly significant surge in RORC protein levels compared to the Model baseline (both p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis confirmed that these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
One-way ANOVA confirmed highly significant differences between media for all measured parameters (OD 600 : F = 2419, p < 0.001; urease activity: F = 381, p < 0.001; CaCO 3 yield: F = 1022, p < 0.001; dry cell weight: F = 227, p < 0.001; culture pH: F = 131, p < 0.001).
For both groups, there was a significant difference between the apical third and the other two-thirds, however, the difference between coronal and middle thirds was not statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
A Kruskall–Wallis test ( Table S3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) for all characteristics analysed except for panicle width and awn length ( p < 0.05).
Since SBP and DBP were not matched at baseline, after adjusting for them, a highly significant reduction in SBP (mean 16 mm/Hg) and DBP (mean 8.6 mm/Hg) was observed among the experimental group ( p < 0.001 ∗∗ ).
ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) among the genotypes for all the relative traits.
The highly significant difference occurs in the surface soil (p<0.001), with the range of changes under drip irrigation being smaller than that under flood irrigation.
There was a highly significant effect of the age factor ( p < 0.001; ηp 2 = 0.281; 1 − β = 0.999) and a non-significant effect of the sport factor ( p = 0.437; ηp 2 = 0.005; 1 − β = 0.121).
Analysing the two sampling intervals separately showed a highly significant relationship of detected numbers of pesticides and agricultural production area in May ( p < 0.001) but not in August (SOM Table A8 ).
A clear booster effect was seen in MVA-CHIK vaccinated mice, as the differences between post-prime and post-boost samples were highly significant ( p <0.001) ( Fig. 2b ).
In all cases, the proportion of distance accounted for by subject identity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The significant moderating effect of urban–rural residence on the BMI-chronic disease link remained after controlling for cognitive function (β for interaction term = −0.090, p = 0.002), and the U-shaped BMI-depression relationship remained highly significant after adjusting for functional disability status (β for BMI_z 2 = 0.171, p < 0.001).
According to the ANOVA F test, the HHS in the interval between the first, second, third, and fourth follow-ups was calculated and found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).
The difference in mean VAS scores between the two groups was highly significant (P < 0.001), clearly establishing the superiority of the intraoperative local anesthetic cocktail administered in Group-A over regional anesthesia alone in Group-B for immediate post-operative pain control following knee arthroscopy.
The KMO value of 0.582 exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold, whereas Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 917.76; P < 0.001), confirming adequate intercorrelations among variables.
Results Behavioral data A highly significant main effect for time was found (F (1, 8) = 33.091, p ≤ 0.001), resulting from an overall reduction of tinnitus intensity post-stimulation, regardless of the stimulation.
A longer period of follow-up in our study (i.e., 6 months in our study versus 3 months in the initial validation) in a different setting (i.e., nursing home vs geriatric clinic) made it possible to highlight a highly significant difference in the total TSLUMFA score between the two groups (20 (15.75–22.25) points versus 23 (20–25) points, p-value <0.001).
A highly significant association was found between PV training and PV knowledge ( P < 0.001).
There was highly significant difference in mean fracture resistance in between different groups (p<0.001) by one-way ANOVA (Table 2 - see PDF).
A highly significant main effect of task [ F (2,108) = 29.119, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.350] suggested that the retrieval of dissimilar pairs was more demanding than the retrieval of similar pairs and the DMS-task ( p < 0.001 for both pairwise comparisons, respectively).
All comparisons with artificially balanced Test-2 remained highly significant ( P <.001), reflecting its intentional difference in class ratio.