Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Additionally, highly significant ( p < 0.01) metabolic pathways were identified, including gga01232 (nucleotide metabolism), gga00250 (alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism), gga00240 (pyrimidine metabolism), gga04914 (progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation), gga00220 (arginine biosynthesis), gga00983 (drug metabolism—other enzymes), gga01230 (biosynthesis of amino acids), and gga00230 (purine metabolism).
highly significantP ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Matrix analysis showed highly significant positive correlations (P ≤ 0.01) of the V concentration in water with the Ni and Zn concentration in water, the biological oxygen demand (BOD), and the Zn concentration in WH; the Cr concentration with the Fe and Co concentrations in water; the Mn concentration with the Co concentration in water; t
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of MAGECAA v1.0 with the Original Manual Method As shown in Figure 4 , Spearman's correlation analysis identified that there is a highly significant linear correlation between MAGEc and MAGEo ( r = 0.998, resp.; P < 0.01), and the mean difference found in Bland-Altman plot was −0.03 ± 0.21, which was statistically significantly small.
a significant trendp = 0.010.2× alphagold
a nonsignificant trendp > 0.12.0× alphagold
Like the sea ice cover in the Barents Sea, the wintertime SST sBS index exhibits a nonsignificant trend ( p > 0.1) during the EARLY period followed by a significant trend ( p = 0.01) during the LATE period (see Fig. 2c for comparison of the standardised time series of SST sBS and SIA BS ).
Of the six jargon categories, mean % Thought Understood was lower for Molecular terms than all other terms ( n of Molecular terms = 23, n of other terms = 49, Kruskal-Wallis test χ 2 = 10.9, p < 0.008) and higher, though marginally statistically significant, for Information terms than for all other terms ( n of Information terms = 19, n other terms = 53, Kruskal-Wallis test χ 2 = 6.47, p = 0.01; Figure 2 and Supplemental Table S2).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The declines in chlorophyll a content and carotenoid content showed similar trends, especially in treatments with 20 mg DBP kg −1 , as shown by the significant differences compared to the controls ( p < 0.05) and highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) in Figure 1 a.