Differences were considered significant at a p -value of < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at a p -value of < 0.01 (**) and p -value of < 0.001 (***).
Excerpts
2 ) and the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was defined as follows: ns, not significant ( p > 0.05); *, significant ( p < 0.05); **, highly significant ( p < 0.01); ***, extremely significant ( p < 0.001). 3.
A highly significant shift in the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae , from 0.047% to 2.454% ( p < 0.01), and Escherichia coli / Shigella was seen, although all dogs were healthy (Sandri et al., 2017 ).
The between-group differences for short- and long-term survival were highly significant ( p < 0.01) for the male sex, mean MEAD values (6.45 μA vs 14.96 μA), and PaP Scores (Groups A, B and C), respectively.
The mutation had significant effects on muscling (P < 0.05 for loinwt, emac, emdc, emwc and forequarter) highly significant effects on fatness (P < 0.01 for cfatc and imf) and significant effects on subjective measures of eating quality (P < 0.05 for flavour, tender and satisfaction).
A highly significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in proliferation was found for all doses greater than 0.5 nmol/L after 4- and 6-day treatments, as well as a highly significant ( P < 0.01) decrease for treatments greater than 1.0 nmol/L after 8 days.
Branch number, plant height, leaf dimensions (width and length), and petiole characteristics (length and diameter) exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.01).
There was also a highly significant difference in the community structure of samples produced using extracted DNA or RNA ( p < 0.01). 3.3.2.
To identify cancer-specific regulatory variants, we compared our eQTLs to eQTLs from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project 10 , adopting previous strategies to assess eQTL replication 11 , and probed lead eQTL variants for marginal significance in GTEx tissues ( P ≤ 0.01, Bonferroni-adjusted).
These dif- ferences were all highly significant (p < 0.01).
The difference was considered statistically significant at ∗p < 0.05, highly significant at ∗∗p < 0.01, and not significant (ns) where p > 0.05. 3.
When compared with the control group, the increase of P1 larvae after 10 μM U0126 treatment was highly significant (p<0.01; Fig. 3G ).
The difference between obtained values was considered significant when p <0.05, and highly significant when p <0.01.
The data were considered significant if P < 0.05 and highly significant if P < 0.01.
Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences from Col‐0 control; hash symbols (#) indicate differences from smxl3,5 control plants; ns.: significantly not different from smxl3,5 (4–6 biological replicates with 12 plants per replicate; Kruskal–Wallis non‐parametric test, P < 0.01; Dunn–Bonferroni test).
Notably, the TMSC demonstrates a decreasing trend from 118.98 million in the first quartile to 63.73 million in the fourth quartile, with a P value <.01, indicating a significant association between ADI and TMSC.
Paired t-tests confirmed that all models produced highly significant improvements over reference lengths ( P < .01), with both attention-based approaches exhibiting even stronger significance ( P < .0001).
Military performance also indicated positive and highly significant relationships with self-efficacy (MLP&SFE, r = 0.525, p < 0.01).
Fold changes based on RNA sequencing were smaller but remained highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Any comparison considered statistically significant was at P < 0.05 or less and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Considering Mallomonas annulata , negative growth could be detected at 5°C (−0.213 day −1 ) followed by a positive trend from 8°C (0.059 day −1 , p < 0.01) to 11°C (0.386 day −1 , p < 0.01) and to 15°C (0.508 day −1 , p < 0.01) before slightly but not significantly ( p = 0.997) decreasing at 19°C (0.485 day −1 ) and 23°C (0.443 day −1 , p = 0.244).
Regarding the correlations obtained, highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive ones can be observed between textural parameters, hardness and gumminess ( r = 0.975), cohesiveness and resilience ( r = 0.920) which are indirectly correlated with primary lipid degradation parameters, dienes and trienes.
“*” was considered significant difference ( p < 0.05); “**” was considered extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.
A highly significant difference was defined as P <0.01 (two-tailed). 3.