The body weight gain of the model group was significantly lower than that of the normal group, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
Intra- and inter-individual differences were considered significant if p-values were less than 0.05 ( p < 0.05), and highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 ( p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05, with highly significant values at p < 0.01.
The first sampling time showed a very high standard error due to the variability between replicates, but afterwards, clearance rates stabilized at around 50 mL h −1 gDW −1 , showing a decreasing trend from the beginning ( p < 0.01).
These genotypes also showed extremely significant association with CaC at 4 months of age ( p <0.01).
The T-value of beta regression coefficients of the predictor variable has been found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Remarkably, our finding that livin confers resistance to trastuzumab is strongly supported by clinical data that patients with livin-overexpressing tumors did not respond to trastuzumab as well as those with normal livin, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01), even in the small cohort.
exposed teeth) was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
In contrast, there was a highly significant increase present in the 20 ppm group with a secretory activity of 309.1 ± 36.9 cpm vs. 99.5 ± 27.1 cpm (control, p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was indicated by the following symbols: * for a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** for a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** for an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).
The levels of statistical significance between data sets were defined as: significant if p < 0.05 (*), and highly significant if p < 0.01 (**).
“**” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01 by the Student’s t-test), “*” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05 by the Student’s t-test).
Highly significant positive correlations were observed between C a and C i , as well as between C a , C i and carbon metabolism-related DEGs ( p <0.01) ( Figure 5B (a, b)).
P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant or extremely significant ( P values < 0.01). 3.
There were highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.01, Figure 5 , Supplementary Table S2 ) between the quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation (NPQ) and leaf fresh weight (LFW), leaf dry weight (LDW), leaf area (LA), and leaf thickness (LT).
We continued to follow the nematodes that remained alive to day 17; interestingly, treatment groups still displayed highly significant dose-dependent differences in motility while most of the control nematodes had died ( p < 0.01, data not shown). 3.5 LP-1 decreases the intracellular ROS level and does not affect brood size The free radical theory of aging hypothesized that free radical species caused deterioration of cells and organism.
At the 15th day ( Figure 3C ), however, there was extremely significant difference between Aurantimicrobium and Reyranella ( p ≤ 0.01).
The results showed that the total annual weight loss rate of the male was −4.58% and the total weight gain rate of the female was 24.12%, in which the weight of both individuals registered highly significant differences in summer, fall and winter ( p < 0.01).
Unlike the Auditory Condition, where no significant group difference was found, the motor condition (Silent Tapping) revealed a highly significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.01, df = 1, F = 8.478).
The association was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.01 to 0.001) among GZnC, GFeC (Fig. 2 ), and GPC in each environment and across environments.
An increasing trend was observed in EMS activation time ( p < 0.01) and pre-hospital time ( p < 0.01) year by year, while the response time time fluctuated within a narrow range without significant changes( p = 0.45).
In addition, the mean value of each trait among progeny was positively correlated with the average parental value, with correlation coefficients ( r po ) ranging from 0.33 to 0.73, of which oil and SW appeared to be extremely significant ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 3 ).
These phytochemicals exhibited highly significant results compared to the acarbose with 95% CI, p value < 0.01.
Highly significant differences at the level of p < 0.01 were marked uppercase—A, B and significant differences at the level of p < 0.05 were marked lowercase—a, b.
The mice pretreated with 4-PBA at 5 mg/kg CTN were compared with the CTN group, and # and ##, respectively, represented significant difference ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).