11.57 ± 1.62), with highly significant differences ( P < 0.01).
Excerpts
Santana In the present study, the individual effects of humic acid application rates and periods were found to be highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) for plant height, number of stems plant −1 , number of branches plant −1 , number of leaves plant −1 , and leaf area index (Table S1 ).
From the data presented in Table 3 , it is evident that the relationship between the monthly changes of Rs and the multiple linear regression of soil moisture and temperature in various areas is highly significant ( P < 0.01).
The P value was taken significantly at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
P < 0.05 was reported as significant for all statistical tests (* P < 0.05), and P < 0.01 was reported as highly significant for all statistical tests (** P < 0.01). 3.
All 10 sites exhibited statistically significant differences (P<0.05), and seven sites demonstrated highly significant differences (P<0.01, Table III ).
The best formulation has shown T max of 1 hour which was highly significant ( P < 0.01) when compared with pure drug and marketed formulation.
It was found [ Table 4 ] that there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.01) between the means of healthy lifestyle, anxiety, and depression in terms of gender, age, place of residence, father's education, mother's education, health status, and chronic diseases.
Highly significant differences are indicated by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05.
N4PB analysis revealed statistically significant differences in mean plasma GFAP and NfL, and CSF NfL levels with an increasing trend between normal controls, IPD<2 yrs to onset, sIPD, and CJD cohorts (p < 0.01).
Differences were recognized as significant when p < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.01.
This was highly significant in sero-negative patients (median: 14 days vs. 27 days; p value < 0.01).
The results of this analysis showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in SASP-associated cytokines PAI-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and VEGF in the patients with active PDR compared to the control group ( Oubaha et al., 2016 ).
There was no difference between p-glucose or HbA1c between the groups, but a highly significant difference in C peptide p<0.01 was observed.
[ 42 ] reported that N and P fertilizers had extremely significant ( P < 0.01) effects on the 100-seed weight of mung bean.
A highly significant difference was observed between PCDD/Fs TEQ in crabs and that in sediments or feeds ( p < 0.01), and the effect size was low (Cohen’d 0.25) and large (Cohen’d 1.04), respectively.
The Joint F-statistics and Wald statistics were highly significant (p<0.01), which proves that the model was statistically significant.
used VAS to assess post-ESS bleeding for each group at postoperative day (POD) 1, and found a highly significant reduction in the MPH packed group ( P <0.01) [22] .
Two parental inbred lines showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) in seven traits (RGR, RSL, RRL, RTL, RRSA, RRAD, RRV, and RSVI), except RRAD that showed a significant difference ( P < 0.05).
Compared with the sleep deprivation group, the cognitive rate was increased in each dose group of Acanthopanax senticosus, and the difference between the high- and medium-dose groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the low-dose group was significant ( p < 0.05).
Results In the factor analysis, Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( P < .01), indicating that the 18-item correlation matrix was not an identity matrix.
Data in all the bioassays were evaluated by Student's t-test at a univariate level, p-value<0.05 or p-value<0.01 were respectively regarded as significant differences or extremely significant differences. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 as compared to control sample.
Even when both forest area and DBH were positively associated with preferred breeding habitats, GLMMs showed that the extension of forest area ( b = 4.09 ± 2.11, p = 0.05, marginally significant; Fig. 1 B) influenced 82 times more than DBH ( b = 0.04 ± 0.02, p = 0.01).
An extremely significant difference was observed between the group receiving free Ptx and the group receiving Ptx nanoparticles ( P < 0.01) or Ptx/Tet nanoparticles ( P < 0.01).
The ANOVA showed that the influence of treatment on colour, flavour, and texture was non-significant ( p > 0.05); however, a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) influence was observed on taste.